1. Wlad is not an All-Time Great. 2. Neither is Haye. 3. Both fighters have strengths and flaws. 4. Nobody is suddenly "exposed" by losing to a good opponent. 5. The winner is not the undisputed HW champion. Just thought I would get this out of the way before the bandwagons of fans and haters invade the forum tomorrow. Anything else you would like to add?
The forum will probably be down tomorrow from all the traffic. People have been waiting for a long time, and its finally here. (Knock on wood)
I will never limit a man's potential, but a victory tomorrow night does not elevate him to ATG status.
Regardless of tomorrow's outcome everyone here will stay wake up sunday morning to their shitty lives... -lebron
Vitali vs Adamek is for a trinket, right? The WBC belt, actually. So, no, the winner of this fight would need to fight the winner of that fight to have an undisputed champion. I should have said "undisputed" not "unified"
At work so not really off the top of my head, but most people have him top 10/15. You're pretty deluded to not see this.
:huh But Haye has a belt and Wladimir has 4 belts. They will unify the belts and the winner will have the IBO, WBO, IBF, WBA and The Ring belts. :think