Tomasz Adamek on Wlad-David

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by abbes, Jul 1, 2011.


  1. gregy741

    gregy741 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,270
    1
    May 11, 2010
    nah....Adamek is too good...ask BHOP who ducked him for reason
     
  2. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,862
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    senior citizens cant duck.
     
  3. teewoods

    teewoods Guest

    Adamek is a bitcko groupie! I wonder what round the would throw the fight away to Vitali?
     
  4. chico g

    chico g Let's watch some Sesame Street...lmao Full Member

    10,925
    12,297
    Oct 18, 2008
    I reckon the kingpin Kevin Johnson would beat Adamek.......
     
  5. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,862
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    he would school him like dawson did.
     
  6. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    148
    Mar 7, 2010
    are you completely delusional? He lost to Dawson. All the evidence we have points to him not being as good as Dawson, head to head. Winning and losing is how boxers are measured. When one boxer beats the other boxer, he's "better" on that night. Dawson was better than Adamek on the night they met and the proof of this is absolutely bullet proof, on video tape, and in the record books for all posterity (even the delusional) to witness.
     
  7. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    Adamek was terribly weight drained at 175 and was given basically the worst gameplan ever against Dawson too. Look at how their careers have gone since that fight. Adamek is the better boxer.
     
  8. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    So according to you're logic thompson is a better fighter than haye?

    Since winning and losing is how boxers are measured clearly :yep
     
  9. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    148
    Mar 7, 2010
    It's not logic, it's a principle. All the evidence we have is that when Adamek fought Dawson, Adamek was outboxed. It wasn't some fluke one-punch KO, it was one guy beating the other guy rather soundly and winning an uncontroversial decision.
     
  10. abbes

    abbes Guest

    :rofl

    the guys that can beat Adamek: Solis(in shape), Klits. Any other figths will be close or dominated by Adamek
     
  11. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,862
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    adamek hasn't fought a slick fighter since getting embarrassed by daddy dawson.
     
  12. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    Cunningham isn't slick?
     
  13. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,862
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    cunningham is slick? :lol::rofl:rofl


    being black doesnt just make someone slick.
     
  14. abbes

    abbes Guest

    ehhh... it was 4 years ago
    at LHW...
     
  15. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    He has good hand speed, uses his footwork and head movment to avoid punches, and is a technical boxer....

    Wtf does him being black have to do with it? :patsch Pathetic


    Tell me, what is the definition of slick? Don't give me any examples. Give me a definition