are you completely delusional? He lost to Dawson. All the evidence we have points to him not being as good as Dawson, head to head. Winning and losing is how boxers are measured. When one boxer beats the other boxer, he's "better" on that night. Dawson was better than Adamek on the night they met and the proof of this is absolutely bullet proof, on video tape, and in the record books for all posterity (even the delusional) to witness.
Adamek was terribly weight drained at 175 and was given basically the worst gameplan ever against Dawson too. Look at how their careers have gone since that fight. Adamek is the better boxer.
So according to you're logic thompson is a better fighter than haye? Since winning and losing is how boxers are measured clearly :yep
It's not logic, it's a principle. All the evidence we have is that when Adamek fought Dawson, Adamek was outboxed. It wasn't some fluke one-punch KO, it was one guy beating the other guy rather soundly and winning an uncontroversial decision.
:rofl the guys that can beat Adamek: Solis(in shape), Klits. Any other figths will be close or dominated by Adamek
He has good hand speed, uses his footwork and head movment to avoid punches, and is a technical boxer.... Wtf does him being black have to do with it? atsch Pathetic Tell me, what is the definition of slick? Don't give me any examples. Give me a definition