Why are fans of 'The Sweet Science' (Floyd/Bhop fans) slow to defend the Klitschkos?

Feedback..???:nut

99.9% of Wlads fans are African and African Americans. 99.9 and 3/4 of Floyd and Hops fans are all caucasians. 100% of Pacquiaos fanatical fans like yourself (and not Pacquiaos knowledgeable fans) are Exlaxedonfians. The Exlaxedonfians come from a far, far planet called CONVOLUTED. They are always getting **** mixed up. Come to find out, they are trying to rob our planet of its hashish. Did you know that Cane?

 

race and nationality shouldnt be a issue here, it only limits us.

 

as far as i'm concerned its not them, they're good, they just came along at a time when the divison was lacking, not enough talented hungry heavy weights to test them and give us a look inside.

 

Because Floyds style is just as exciting as PAc's style. Visually watching Floyd slip 3 punches in succession and landing a counter uppercut, and Pacquiao blitzing his opponent is just as visually appealing.

There is a difference between being methodical and safety first, and doing a Wlad Klitscko. Floyd fights in the pocket, Floyd counters, Floyd parry's, Floyd lands more then 40 power punches lol!

Even so, yes I prefer action in heavyweight fights as opposed to slickness and crafty.

Im a fan of Pac you ****ing ******. How many times do I have to say it.



I notice how you didnt answer my question again ******. How are Mike Tyson and Klitscko similar moron? Klitscko has a higher KO% but you dont see how Mike Tysons fights were more exciting?

Seriously just wow.


And you still dont understand the difference between Floyds style and Wlads do you?

 

While Ruiz did suck he doesn't fall into the category of being a hype job, or being overweight. Ruiz was never hyped especially after being KO'ed in 19 seconds and he was usually in decent shape. Had he been more dominant he still would have been unpopular, maybe respected, but still unpopular. Infact he has quite some goods wins, though sometimes controversially.

Dominant champions have been unpopular before. Holmes was far from loved by the fans and was universally regarded as the dominant champion. Much like the Klits he came after a great era dominated by a great champion and while respected for his ability will never be loved as much as Ali.

Ottke was another dominant champion. The only other supermiddle that mattered was Calzaghe and Ottke was rated above Calzaghe at the time due to him beating a number of american super middles and even unifying 2 titles. Yet america ignored him as well. So your suposition that a boring fighter that is dominant will get respect and popularity is clearly in error based on these examples.

 

It's NOT as ENTERTAINING... Seriously dude it's been said a million times. drop it.

 

You're are the one comparing PAcquiao to Mayweather moron. :rofl You claim I dont like Pac when I consistently say im a big fan.


And we keep trying to explain to your dumbass, that Floyd's "safety first" style and Bhops "safety first" style, is nowhere near as "safety first" as Wlad is. Even when Bhop and Mayweather for most of their careers have been moving up in weight and been outweighed massively, and Wlad on the other hand always has the weight advantage.


Seriously *******, what was your mother drinking when she had you? Why cant you understand the difference between Floyds style and Wlads? The difference in Wlad being twice the size of his opponents? The difference in Wlad not countering or slipping punches and coming back with shots of his own, and what he does in the ring? And how him and Floyd are nothing alike in their approach to boxing?


How many coronas was she stuffed with in the waiting room?

 

Umm nobody liked Holmes. Infact he is still bitter about it today. And Holmes was NOWHERE near as boring as Wlad.


seriously ******* are you lying again? Because Holmes was far more exciting and elected to finish his opponents when he could? Have you actually seen any of Holmes fights?

 

stfu!

 

Sense or cents???:huh