Maybe, id say it was about even. Problem with that ofcourse that it isnt a pub carpark battle its a sport and it comes down to a hell of alot more than who got hit the hardest.
disagree !! Neither one of them did much damage, so what's the point of discussing it? Forget the cut in Wlads face, and the scratches in Hayes face. That was not real damage. The only damage done was the one to HW boxing. Hayes ego did not got damaged, he still belives that if he hadn't had a broken toe, then he would have won. Probably he will buy himself a new Ferrari, that will help him to not to feel to bad about the loss (in the ring that is, not in the bank account).
This statement may or may not be true, in so far as it may have been the "closest" but it's an irrelevant statement to make since it was even remotely close to scoring a knockdown.
Haye landed the harder more damaging shots throughout the fight. He had WK hurt more than Klitchko hurt him... that is not to say I think Haye won the fight, but I believe he did do more damage.
A scratch under an eye is hardly damage. This thread is butt hurt fans. Accept your man lost. He landed maybe two good punches, but even with the one in the 12th, he got nailed with two flush right hands right after that in the corner. Haye's face was pretty swollen after the fight, and did you see that TOE? Holy ****! Your man Haye has manned up and said he got beat fair and square, why can't you?