Wlad's p4p ranking

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Jul 5, 2011.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,607
    21,212
    Sep 15, 2009
    Is this really justified having him in the top 10?

    I mean considering his size and skillset are we really to believe there aren't 6 men out there who are superior?

    Are we to believe a 6 foot 5 adamek or haye or cunningham couldn't dominate the division also?

    Don't get me wrong, wlad has achieved an incredible amount but as a p4p fighter I see no way he can be considered so highly.

    I saw a thread on here comparing his skills to floyd mayweather's for crying out loud!

    As a heavyweight wlad is very good and very dominant but this is largely due to his size. And p4p is supposed to take size out of the equation right?

    Can anyone put forth a realistic argument that wlad is top ten p4p?
     
  2. Olympia77

    Olympia77 New Member Full Member

    76
    0
    Nov 24, 2009
    how often do you see a man of his size with the skills and athletic gifts he has?
    Dude has been champion since 2004 and been knocking everybody out, his accomplishments speak for themselves. Guy easily belongs in the P4P rankings.
     
  3. Aint no stoppin

    Aint no stoppin Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,179
    926
    Dec 15, 2008
    Wladimir is one of the hardest man to beat! i think he is a little bit too high in the p4p ranking though! but he deserves everything hes a good champion and good guy
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,607
    21,212
    Sep 15, 2009
    As flawed as your factual representations are you still don't address a p4p consideration.

    Do you think wlad's size has played a part in his success? The advantages he holds in height, reach and weight?
     
  5. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    Yeah I agree with you, but I just put him there because he has that size and uses it to it's advantages and his size does bring disadvantages.
    He doesn't need to be ahead of
    Floyd, Pac, Marquez, Donaire or Martinez though for sure
     
  6. GrowlDotMe

    GrowlDotMe Member Full Member

    234
    0
    Nov 27, 2010
    usa usa usa
     
  7. Aint no stoppin

    Aint no stoppin Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,179
    926
    Dec 15, 2008
    i would rank andre ward also higher if he beats froch!
    froch should have been on the p4p list long ago too!
    froch is the man!!
     
  8. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    One must value the unlimited division somewhat differently than all other divisions. It would be justifiable if someone generally put more stock in the division (Riddick Bowe was Ring's #6 P4P in 1992; Mike Tyson was Ring's #1 P4P in 1989). Based on past precedents, Wladimir is of P4P top 10 quality.

    If you are talking about pure pounds, which you are, I would tell you to look at the weight of his opposition during current title run:
    243, 213, 224, 247, 228, 219, 247, 253, 224, 209, 241, 213
    The weights of his opposition during his original title run:
    213, 260, 234, 241, 228, 263

    I think it is totally reasonable to have Wladimir in the top 10 P4P, and would ask to see your list if you didn't.

    1. Pacquiao
    2. Mayweather
    3. Martinez
    4. Donaire
    5. JMM
    6. Wladimir Klitschko
    7. Hopkins
    8. Bradley
    9. Segura
    10. Ward
     
  9. gobblock

    gobblock Boxing Addict banned

    5,623
    1
    Mar 20, 2009
    The only thing the detractors have left to whine about are a couple inches of height. Sad. Hypothethicals like a 6'5 Haye are meaningless because they would be quite literally different people with different careers, styles, physical attributes and everything else.

    Pound for pound means "regardless of weight division," not "regardless of exact weight." As far as the sport is concerned, Wlad is a male heavyweight professional boxer, not a 240-245 pounder.
     
  10. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    Yeah I feel you on that. I feel people are ranking Ward too high right now though. I want to wait til after the Froch fight before I rank him higher. Once he beats him, I'll have him side by side with Marquez
     
  11. Jennifer Love Hewitt

    Jennifer Love Hewitt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,833
    2,107
    Jul 19, 2004
    P4p is about skill when size is factored out of the equation. A fighter whose main attribute is his size should not be highly regard on a P4p basis, unless he was also exceptionally skilled. Wlad has some skill, but I think he has much more size than skill.
     
  12. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    very good point. Also nice p4p list. Mine is almost the same except I have Segura at 11, Ward number 9 and Gamboa at 10
     
  13. Heavyrighthand

    Heavyrighthand Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,149
    1,044
    Jan 29, 2005
    Good point, and yes his size advantage certianly plays big role in his success. Noone can deny that.

    The fact that he's so big, and skilled, is not what is being discussed.


    The OP has a good point. Pound for pound means a level playing field, with only ability being a factor.

    The K Bros are so successful because they are the first time we've seen such big guys ALSO have world class skills.


    But on skills, alone, not sure if they'd be P4P or not.
     
  14. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,569
    1,280
    May 31, 2010
    One name.......Julius Long.

    If size mattered that much, he'd be the GOAT.
     
  15. skier47

    skier47 Guest

    This whole size argument is a joke. There are advantages and disadvantages to height and weight. A short to the ground crab like Mike Tyson was an awesome heavyweight champion who sparked out a truckload of much taller opponents. Wlad has been the dominant heavyweight champion for over 5 years now. Some bloke in this thread put Donaire ahead of Wlad. Who the hell knew who Donaire was even two to three years ago? Wlad has been a dominant force in the most prestigious division of boxing for at least 12 years now. He won and defended the WBO title 7 times, had his bad years and like a phoenix rose under Steward to dominate for over a half a decade and counting. He has the one of the highest knockout percentages in heavyweight history and has defended his title since slaughtering long-term heavyweight champ Chris Byrd more times than Mike Tyson. He has barely lost a round to any fighter since 2004 and breaks their wills often before the 4th round. U.S.A. based Ring Magazine, who like you have no love for Wlad Klitschko are honorable enough to rank him P4P no. 6 as objective journalists they really have no choice. Believe me, they were like you praying on bended knee for a Haye victory but it was not to be. Talent, hard work and great tactics almost always win out in the end. Wishful thinking rarely does.