Could Wlad win a close and real "fight"?

Sam Peter was a clown.

He just exposed how pathetic Wlad is, when he actually tries to box

Wlad's only dominated since then, as he just fights ultra conservative

 

Come on.

The fact that you're calling Sam Peter a real opponent, is testament to Wlad's sorry career.

Wlad used to try and box. But he got hit too much for his liking

So Manny Steward decided that if Wlad does his best to not ever get hit, he has more chance of losing.

And he does that by never using his right hand:hi:

 

Come on. It wouldn't take Lewis to beat Wlad pretty easily.

Put him in with any quality big guy, of the 1990s, and he'd lose.

Wlad has one fight. He tries to control the distance between himself and an opponent, so he doesn't get hit

You cant' get away with fighting one handed, with a quality guy, you're own size, with the same length arms as you

 

Hahaha

Is there a Klitshcko version of "******* yet"

Let me get this straight. A 39 year old, overweight version of Lewis, retires Vitali in 5 rounds. Not only competes with a peak Vitali easily, but is starting to dominate him when it is stopped.

Vitali is much better than Wlad.

And Wlad only loses to a few all time greats!?

As I said. Delusion. Wlad wouldn't have gone 5 rounds with Riddick Bowe

 

Wlad was winning against Brewster even though each round was very close and hard fought. Could today's version of Wlad not suffer the same stamina breakdown? Quite likely.

 

SEPT 24, 2005 - Peter I

 

his style doesnt allow a close fight

long jab tight defense

doesnt open up as much offensivley

idk how a tough fight would go he has tired in the past

 

Sam Peter is a decent "Grade C" slugger, skillwise he's very limited, but to his credit he has a good hard punch & respectable toughness.