*in kirk's voice* yes tackle m'man you're absolutely right. I think to be fair lufcrazy should get the shot after all politics robbed him of his rightful first defence.
Yeah, well, real boxing politics robbed me of my rightful first defence, but you don't see me moaning about it constantly. :bart
Indeed, like I don't like to bring up that I got muscled out of the way for my shot... That Avy becomes you Baj :thumbsup
I like both guys so I probably would have had a Wlad avatar anyway. Unfortunately I'll be away for a week from next Tuesday so you won't see it so often.
Lol well by rights i'm still champ in my eyes since bar beat the snot out of cab, might start a new belt called the person's championship haha. Nah i'll get my moment in sun again and avenge my defeat to you in the process!
atsch There is no such rule! I've been betting on one fighter while picking his opponent for the championship, one isn't mandated to have the same pick for everything. But tell you what, you can't get out of the people's defense, but here I am throwing an additional This content is protected on Sugar S with the robbery clause. A risk good enough for you? Who I'll pick for the championship is none of your business unless it's me holding the people's belt and I MUST make them as early as possible which will be this coming Sunday.
:roll: Such rule need to be implemented. Otherwise it'll be childs play to challenge and win the belt. The challengers would have nothing to lose. Nothing. Atleast if you bet on someone you're not picking you still risk to lose your money.:bart
Well for Heaven's sake (where we saints are heading), what the flying heck does a freakin challanger has to lose entering ANY titlefight? atsch He's the CHALLENGER for a reason for crying out loud. Challengers don't risk a thing, champions do. DUH? PS. u ok w/ This content is protected and RobC?
Meh. Let's forget it. Probably fairest anyway if the belt is hard to keep, hence more people get's the chance to become (paper) champions.:yep