The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

In terms of combination punching, landing punches from unorthodox angles, the ability to generate power from short distances, Pacquiao is far superior to Floyd.


Offensively Pacquiao is probably top 5 greatest fighters I've ever seen. He's a juggernaught.

In terms of body punching, Floyd is the better puncher however.


Again *******s being whiny bitches again. :-(

 

I cannot believe I am having a discussion with someone who is saying a technically inept runner like Amir Khan would've done better against an Erik Morales calibre fighter than Manny Pacquiao did.

Every day, MichiganWarrior humiliates himself even more than the day before...

 

Blizted .. , now Floyd is an offensive fighter apparently. When has Floyd blitzed anybody? Accoridng to *****s, Floyd is not only a good defensive fighter, but he's an amazing body puncher, hits harder thanPacquiao, has an iron chin.. what else can Floyd do ?

 

Do you even read my posts? :huh

The reason I'm not a fan of the jab to the body is what?

Because it leaves the guy who throws it vulnerable to counter shots.

Thomas Hearns is 6ft 1in and has a 78in reach. Roberto Duran is 5ft 7in and has a 66in reach.

Even you should be able to do this math and come up with the correct answer.

 

You believe Zahir Raheem is better then Amir Khan?

 

Go watch his fights at 130.

Actually people have only said that Mayweather is a better body puncher then Pacquiao and has a better chin.

You added the other because as I said, youre a whiny *****. :good

 

Thats just more distance that Hearns has to lean in to throw the punch. atsch


When Hearns threw the jab he was in range to be hit back, but because of his speed and timing, it froze Duran and he couldnt respond. Thus the intention of the punch. atsch



Again pretty much you are asking why dont more fighters use the check hook or the right hand lead. Pretty stupid thing to say if you ask me

 

Technically, he is better than Amir Khan, undoubtedly.

Amir Khan relies on speed and output, he has no defence whatsoever, amateurish footwork, and a china chin.

Remember, Erik Morales fought Pac at 130lbs, so a 140lbs Amir Khan would not be fighting that Erik Morales, this is only a viable hypothetical if we imagine how Khan would fare against a Morales calibre fighter who was 140lbs.

Khan would get obliterated. Where an uncultured clubber like Maidana was extremely close to stopping Khan, a vastly superior fighter like Morales would embarrass and KO Khan.


I'll reiterate - saying Amir Khan does better against a Morales calibre fighter than Pacquiao did is about the most ****ing mongtarded thing I've read on here since some guy once said that "floored" didn't mean hitting the floor.

Good day to you sir, and happy trolling. Floyd is the GOAT at every single conceivable aspect of boxing.

 

You said a couple posts ago that Floyd ia better puncher, those are ur words not mine.

Floyd couldn't blitz morales if he tried , Morales isn't some punk he can easily school like most of the C / B - grade and old/over the hill fighters he's faced.

 

Oh dear. It appears I was wrong. You couldn't do the math after all. :rofl

 

MW is in even worse form than usual today!

 

Speed and power wise Khan is far superior. In and out foot speed he is superior aswell. And that is all Khan would need to outpoint Morales. Morales would not be able to catch Khan, like he did Maidana and Pacquiao. Khan is undoubtedly a better fighter then Raheem.

Khans chin is not china. He proved that against Maidana. His footwork is shoddy, and he reaches with his punches from time to time. But this wouldnt matter against Morales. Who would be several seconds behind every Amir Khan attack.

That Morales of 130 is probably worse then he is now becuase of the severe weight drain. tHis fight has been proposed and might come to fruition. You will see if Khan and Morales meet up how old and worn Khan will make Morales look.

Maidana is where he is because of his ability to take a punch, his power, and his unrelenting nature. Calling him an "uncultured clubber" means nothing. Considering the fact he has been in the ring with 3 of the best fighters at 140, Kotelnik, Ortiz, and Khan and has given the all fits, including knocking out Ortiz. Maidana's style is far better suited for combating Khan weaknesses, then an old weight drained worn Morales would be.

Morales couldnt beat Raheem. Got schooled. Raheem never had another good victory in his career. Same Raheem that lost to Rocky Juarez. Yet Morales beat Pacquiao the previous fight, and was beating him the 1st half of the fight in the second encounter despite being horribly weight drained.

You just need to accept some facts about Pacquiao's weaknesses as to why this Morales was able to beat him and give him fits.

Being whiny ***** again I see. :good

 

Oh God. Oh Christ. Someone help this poor confused child!

 

I meant in terms of body punching.

The Morales that Pac beat was over the hill, severly faded, and weight drained. Also Morales himself never faced a pure boxer before. He said so before fighting Raheem.

Basically Morales that Pac fought would have been easy work for Mayweather.


Mayweather would not have to blame his socks, gloves and blood testing after that fight. :rofl

 

No math required. When Hearns threw the jab to the body he was in perfect range to be countered. Duran couldnt because he was frozen in his tracks

Just admit when you are wrong buddy. :good