The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    :rofl:rofl


    :patsch:patsch
     
  2. osreyes77

    osreyes77 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,296
    1
    Nov 14, 2010
    Which is?
     
  3. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    If you need me to tell you then god help you :rofl
     
  4. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    You're just looking for **** to argue about. Try to understand, not every comment, discussion, or decision people mmake is imbedded with logic that applies to something else. Just nitpicking. Or bored. :lol:
     
  5. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007

    Please let me know when Roger becomes Mayweather's promoter and/or businesss manager. I don't know how you're going to listen to the word of the trainer over the fighter in terms of puse requests. There's no way in hell that anyone would ask for a guarenteed $100M.
     
  6. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    Serious question?
     
  7. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    You're the one who started with me. I never intiated any conversation with you. You are always looking to argue with me and are always wrong.
     
  8. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    So when other parties speak for PAc, it's legit. Anyone speaks for Floyd, you pull that card. Nice consistency.
     
  9. osreyes77

    osreyes77 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,296
    1
    Nov 14, 2010
    U said the ONLY person who mentioned the $100mil demand was Arum. I was only proving you wrong.
     
  10. osreyes77

    osreyes77 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,296
    1
    Nov 14, 2010
    Arum agrees to have Pac undergo random blood testing by a world renoun anti doping agency, and the Floydettes still find a reason to ***** and moan! LOL. :huh
     
  11. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Started? I gave you an explanantion. You are just stuck in a loop of "But logic" says and nitpicking over something you cannot grasp. Chill out.

    And always wrong? Wow...must be nice to be so stubborn you think your right all the time. Sorry if I posssess a little more humility. But i'm sure you REALLY are always right. :lol:
     
  12. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007

    Lance, I want you to find a post from me where I make this claim. Don't argue against **** I neve said. I don't take the claims of Koncz or Roach seriously. I really don't even listen much to Pacquiao because there seems to be a language barrier. However, Arum is the promoter and makes all the decisions. I have to take what he says serious;y
     
  13. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    Pac and arum said testing was not an issue only a month ago, yet today we hear there is an issue, the company that does the tests :rofl
     
  14. Sweet Jones

    Sweet Jones Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,672
    6
    May 24, 2007
    It should be noted that the CUTOFF has been the issue. And if you read any of the articles with this latest statement from Arum, at no point does the term 'up until the fight' get mentioned (nor asked by these 'reporters')

    In other words, just another cryptic, non-direct statement from Arum for the Pac rubes.
     
  15. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    I can't help it if you're not grasping a basic concept. Like I said, if you don't realize the blatant inconsistency in Arum claiming the USADA isn't neutral, then there's no point in us continuing that discussion.

    I thought we weren't supposed to take everything literally?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.