The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,936
    3,280
    Apr 26, 2010
    If you know what random means, then why would you perpetuate this non sense, it's a random test they stopped at 18 days, the next time it may be 6, this is irrelevant though, Manny caved and will be testing up to the day of the fight (so they say), so it doesn't really matter.
     
  2. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005

    As I said before it called random testing, the concept behind this is so that neither party knows when they will or will not test, nor will they be aware of when the testing begins or finishes.....

    As long as neither party was aware they would stop taking blood you can consider that random....
     
  3. randomwalk

    randomwalk Active Member Full Member

    1,035
    0
    Feb 25, 2010
    Has Floyd called it Olympic style drug testing? He usually calls it "random urine and blood" tests in his interviews. If it wasn't clear before, it's clear now that Floyd wants a mental edge over Manny who clearly blamed his loss against Morales on the blood test.
     
  4. Wicksy

    Wicksy Member Full Member

    342
    0
    Jan 23, 2011
    What the point of this thread?

    No one get's caught at the Olympics, it's in competiton!

    You get caught out of competition. That's the point of a testing programme, It doesn't matter who's doing the testing you just need out of competition, all year round testing.
     
  5. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    45,581
    13,493
    Mar 5, 2006
    there's personal experience from the pac/morales fight you twat.:smoke
     
  6. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    I was NOT saying anything fishy occured, or that Flolyd had anything to do with it. My question is, why'd they stop so far out, when that was what stopped the fight?

    If you don't think those conducting the testing were aware of the negotiating and what stopped it, you are fooling yourself.

    Again, before you guys get all hysterical and mad, I am just wondering why that would be the case. And if you can't give a proper thought on this, then don't bother replying. Appreciate it.:good
     
  7. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005

    Again its Random testing, though they did stop that far out from the fight, they had the right to test anytime since then as well. as long as neither fighter was aware the testing ended there is no issue with the frequencey of the testing....

    Reality is they could have tested up to the fight had they wanted to, but decided to cut off with out informing either side, and went for UA's up to the fight..

    Again the concept of Random testing is so that neither party knows when they will be tested, so if you stop testing at a specific time as long as neither party is aware no harm is done...

    And again Manny Pacquiao could have made a mental note that they did stop testing this far out, and he should have accepted the terms a long time ago...

    Either way no foul was done...

    But regardless of what they new about negotiations and didnt know, it has no relevence to how they conducted their testing for the Mosley fight.... They are an entity that is required to conduct testing a specific way.. they are not ment to test based on what a fighter feels is the right way to test.
     
  8. whoupicking?

    whoupicking? Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,378
    2
    Mar 4, 2010
    Look at this pac stan on a mission to hate USADA just because Arum said so. :rofl:rofl
     
  9. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    You don't have to try and explain what random is. We all know. That isn't the point anyway.

    It's just odd that because the cut off days were what killed they fight, and then the testers just stop so far out when they could have kept testing.

    Tell me that in a fight where the days to stop testing were such a major factor, that this just doesn't come off as odd.
     
  10. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    Well with little testing being done its hard to answer that, However Manny claims he was blood drained for Morales in fight 1... but yet feels he can test up the the fight now:roll:
     
  11. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    :patsch who ****in cares about that, not even relevent.
     
  12. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    5
    Oct 23, 2005
    Neither is your questioning why the testing was stopped 18 days out...
     
  13. Caliboxing

    Caliboxing Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,203
    4,556
    Sep 28, 2007
    Write the association a letter and ask them if you question their practices. Or maybe Arum should hire some of you to do a better job with the testing.
     
  14. boxon123

    boxon123 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,040
    72
    Nov 28, 2004
    Go look up the history of the USOC which became the USADA. The ceo of USADA was on the legal team that represented the USOC . See if you can defend them.
     
  15. Sweet Jones

    Sweet Jones Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,672
    6
    May 24, 2007
    So, not only has Bob Arum's client now doing the much hated OSDT, but (if you believe Arum's latest statement) they are doing so with a worse deal than was on the table 18-20 months ago (14 day cutoff). This in spite of the great 'PR' battle Top Rank has allegedly 'won' since the end of the first negotiations.

    Help me understand. What's so smart about that? :huh
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.