If SRR has started his career in say...2000...

If Robinson began his career in 2000, he would be growing up in our time. He gets access to modern physical training?

 

Go shave the hair on your mother's upper lip.:yep

 

i think he means sugar ray robinson mate.

 

Which makes the Froch argument even worse, since we're going from an ATG to possibly the GOAT.

 

Sounds like someone doesn't know what a fact is. That is not a ****ing fact child.

In most sports this is true but in boxing they're doing the same **** they did in the 40's, training hasn't changed nor has strategy. There's supplements available nowadays that weren't back then but if SRR was around nowadays he'd be on those too so your argument is futile you stunned little child. Fact is that boxing was better back then, 50 times more participants plus the same training/ strategy as they have nowadays plus far more hands on training with more fights and sparring= a better era!! Surely even a child who just started watching boxing last year such as yourself can understand this.

 

You are a ****ing idiot, that I know for sure.

 

Is SRR supposed to be fighting in this era but not benefiting from sports science and diet etc?

People who say people have evolved and are faster and just ridiculous. How have people evolved? If anything the human gene pool will devolve as there is no longer survival of the fittest. Do people think that if the Klitschkos were born with their exact genes in the 40s but had a 40s diet etc they would still be 6"7?

People aren't evolving. The reason why people are faster now than then is because now we know more about the human body and we can create supplement and, in the case of 100m sprinters, steroids that enhance the fast twitch fibres.

 

Also surely George Foremans comeback in the 90s age 40 show that boxers aren't getting more skilled and if anything got worse between his two careers because he was as effective as a fat old man as he was as a young fit man.

 

:deal

:deal

 

I suspect his career would look a lot like Mayweather's.

 

What ur talking about fool?

All it shows that there's way too many belts in boxing today.
In the old days it used to be 1-2 max now u got ****ing 16.
Any tool can be a champ now, look at haye, valuev, rjj, ruiz all proved if u cherry pick enough u can be a "champ."

Foreman got embarrassed by hollyfield, the true HW champ who was really just a bulky CW....atsch

 

What are YOU talking about fool?

All Im saying is that the idea that sport moves so quickly gets massively exagerated. Look at Ryan Giggs if footballers had progressed so much since the 90s how come he can still do it at 37?

Same with Hopkins at 46. Eras overlap and its only shot fighters who get embarrassed by the up and coming generation.

 

I just killed ur argument with facts and u started talking about football now?
Go away u spaz before I ***** slap u around general.:think

 

Facts?

What facts?

Even though I agree that there are too many belts now that doesn't constitute fact, its just opinion.

 

These three wont beat him..Thats for damn sure.

B-hop would get outworked, Sergio M. would probably be stopped IMO, and Froch would get slaughtered...I really dont see the talent in today's pool of boxer that would give me reason to pick them against SRR.