The Unpopular Opinion Thread

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by salsanchezfan, Jun 10, 2011.


  1. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    5,005
    15
    Jul 29, 2010
    nothing unpopular about this opinion at least from my point of view. toney from this time would eat up calzaghe. no pun intended.
     
  2. Tin Man Waldo

    Tin Man Waldo Freakishly Fragile Full Member

    726
    2
    May 19, 2011
    What is Prime Foreman w/monocle? :huh
     
  3. ThinBlack

    ThinBlack Boxing Addict banned

    4,768
    26
    Sep 18, 2007
    Ray Mancini would beat Julio Ceasar Chavez at 135.
     
  4. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,124
    8,572
    Jul 17, 2009
    Ken Norton would have beaten a fair amount of linear title holders.
     
  5. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    What about the young Foreman with the parrot on his shoulder?:D
     
  6. DannyL12345

    DannyL12345 Active Member Full Member

    766
    2
    Nov 2, 2010
    The heavyweight division is overrated currently? People **** all over the division no matter who you ask.
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,575
    27,221
    Feb 15, 2006
    Aint that the truth!
     
  8. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    More than a few, unfortunately. The frontal lobe damage is also a cause for poor decision making skills-including business decisions- which is another contributing factor as to why so many ex-boxers and ex-NFL players (the numbers around 75% or so for ex-NFLers I believe) go broke after retirement.
     
  9. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    Exactly, and while I guess I was a bit strong to say that it's underrated historically, you also get people who absolutely **** on it in the historical context too.
     
  10. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    I don't think it's a bit strong to say it's underrated historically. The biggest problem I have with it is that contenders aren't fighting each other as frequently as they should, but I don't think it's any worse from a talent standpoint than the early 60's, 80's, and early 2000's were. The fights just need to get made.
     
  11. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    I guess it depends on who's doing the underrating. Casual fans? It might be overrated. Here/other places where it's more boxing 'experts' I think it tends to get underrated.
     
  12. Blood Green

    Blood Green Guest

    The fights are actually being made now. I'm not gonna list them out, but there has been a decent amount in the last year and scheduled for the near future.
     
  13. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    The 100+ fight careers of "classic" boxers are overrated. Very few of them had extensive amatuer careers if at all. Some turning pro as young as 15. Throw in some meaningless "Non Tittle" fights which amount to exbitions and you have 100 fights.
     
  14. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,030
    Jun 30, 2005
    I suspect, but can't prove, that either Lennox Lewis or Jack Dempsey is the GOAT head-to-head.

    These are mutually exclusive statements, though: if Lennox is the GOAT, then Dempsey isn't even close to top 10 quality, and vice-versa.

    All has to do with the relative popularity of boxing compared with the marginal advantages of modern training. We'd be in for a surprise either way if we put old timers and modern fighters in a time machine.
     
  15. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    Damn, you'd really be useful if you could