Who's better a better fighter Chad Dawson or Felix Sturm?

I think a lot of people mostly because of Dawson's physical abilities and boxing skills and also to see if the old man can do it again, those are many of reason's why people will be watching even if they don't want to.

 

:good

 

I agree and he's also a much better fighter not according to bailey though.

 

Dawson by a landslide.

 

sturm has fans

 

at what weight is hopkins v sturm?

 

That's not the question though for the title of the thread.

 

you asked who would give hopkins more trouble if he fought them back to back, so dawson would obviously fight hopkins at 175, so i was wondering whether the sturm fight would be 168 or 175?

 

Better a better is better

 

Yes but you still haven't answered who the better fighter is out of Dawson and Sturm, that's what a wrote in the poll and you know what I was talking about, quit trying to flip things.

 

:rofl
This dude means business lol

 

why is someone even metioning sturm in the same sentence with dawson and hopkins?

 

Is this even a serious question???:rofl I see what you're doing Cannibus!:good

 

Worst thread in the history of ESB.

 

I think bailey would disagree, he's knowledgable poster according to himself.