just watched the frankie gavin fight!

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by rjko23, Jul 19, 2011.


  1. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    27,158
    2
    Apr 24, 2008
    I must have missed the rematch :thumbsup
     
  2. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    He was boring against mutley, not bad. He completely shut him down. Haven't seen the woodhouse fight, but will do tonight. One bad night at the office hardly makes him an easy mark.
     
  3. Havik

    Havik Active Member Full Member

    842
    0
    Oct 11, 2008
    Looking at this thread, I'm far from the only one to have it a clear Gavin win. So, how did you score it?
     
  4. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    20
    Jul 23, 2008
    I think it's all down to expectation on how you view Frankie Gavin and his recent performances. I've always said Frankie is a really good talent, but a little style over substance. By that i mean he has what it takes to pick up a strap along the way and have a very good career, but he needs to have exceptional attributes with his style to operate at truly world class level. I have never got that vibe of a Calzaghe type of special talent from Frankie. It's very difficult for fighters like Gavin to compete at the top for any sustained period if they don't have incredible gifts in their tool box. Frankie is talented, but not special. I hope this makes sense.

    His reflexes and anticipation are good, but not great. He can make you miss but doesn't always make you pay. His power is lacking so he needs to fight really intelligent, be spot on all the time and as he moves up fight close to perfect fights, as he doesn't have that game changer to bail himself out. His boxing IQ needs to be top notch. Basically for him to succeed at world level with his disadvantages he needs perfect fundamentals or incredible defensive reflexes, which he doesn't have. You can't be hit with a double jab from Curtis Woodhouse, if you're gonna stay in hitting range like that your eyes have to be first-rate. You need to take care of the little details like always staying off centre and constantly keeping your foot outside of your opponents lead, which Frankie wasn't always doing against Woodhouse.
     
  5. lirva

    lirva Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,335
    97
    Jul 7, 2010
    Agreed. He simply doesn't throw a lot and doesn't pack much power in his shots. He is primarily a defensive fighter so its not going to pack the crowd into the arena as he moves on. He is a defensive counterpuncher and is not content to lead.. maybe that needs to be taught to him by a better trainer than farnell as i do believe he should get better training. he needs to work on his offense
     
  6. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    20
    Jul 23, 2008
    This is probabily the most spot on scorecard. No arguments if anyone gave Woodhouse the 10th. I probabily gave him the wrong round.
     
  7. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    You really do need to stop this obsession. You're making yourself look a knob.
     
  8. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    27,158
    2
    Apr 24, 2008
    I'm not saying it wasn't a clear Gavin win but after watching it the impression I got was that the 116-113 score was closer than the virtual shutouts people on here had it...You only have to look at Gavins post fight reaction to realise that he knew it wasn't anywhere close to some of the scores you lads have got it.
     
  9. Arnie

    Arnie Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,533
    50
    Mar 17, 2008
    Such a nob u
     
  10. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    20
    Jul 23, 2008
    That was probabily more to do with Frankie being dissappointed with not getting Woodhouse out of there or letting him do better than he expected. He was hard on himself i thought, which isn't a bad thing.

    Take no notice of him, Arnie.
     
  11. Havik

    Havik Active Member Full Member

    842
    0
    Oct 11, 2008
    Despite the score I got, he wasn't quite blowing Woodhouse away. The fight doesn't feel like a 119-110 affair to me either btw, it's just one of those fights where round-by-round scoring doesn't give a wholly accurate view of how the fight went.

    Pre-fight, Gavin was saying he was going to stop Woodhouse, that Woodhouse was nowhere near good enough to be in the ring with him etc... Turns out Woodhouse easily went 12 with him and made most rounds competitive. Frankie can't be happy with that, I'd be worried if he was.
     
  12. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    27,158
    2
    Apr 24, 2008
    It was more than disappointment, the lad was beside himself, completely down and deflated.
     
  13. lirva

    lirva Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,335
    97
    Jul 7, 2010
    for me, woodhouse took the first, second, sixth and tenth clearly enough.

    its mostly gavin in the other rounds but there is a case to be made for curtis in those rounds.

    i dont think its harsh on gavin to give curtis those 4 rounds, thats pretty fair imo.

    they are the ones he won clear enough for me. there is not much in most of the other rounds apart from the 12th
     
  14. widdy

    widdy lancs,where real men live Full Member

    5,747
    0
    Aug 19, 2008
    seriously,mate,lad,lady,what ever the **** you are,will you shut the **** up.

    some questions for you : what experiance do you have i boxing
    have you boxed
    have you hit a bag
    have you been in a ring and hit some pads with a trainer
    have you sparred
    have you shadow boxed
    have you skipped
    have you walked past a boxing gym
    have you watched rocky 1 2 3 4 5 6 ?

    im just asking,cos you got a ****ing lot to say for yourself sweetie:think
     
  15. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    :lol: