The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. floyd_g.o.a.t

    floyd_g.o.a.t Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,735
    5
    Aug 7, 2010
    If your the best, then take the tests.

    Shame Pacquiao needed steroids to get to the top.
     
  2. yup, simple ain't it :deal
     
  3. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    loses and draws doesn't hinder much one's resume if the list of opponents (not only names) but opponents are tough. tell me where in floyd's resume where it was comparable to when pacquiao fought barrera, marquez and morales in just a span of 16 months?

    also if you would put asterisk on pac's resume, you could also put some asterisks on floyd's when he fought a drained corrales, marquez at 144 catchweight and yet he cheated the man by weighing over and also you could also put an asterisk by saying he fought hatton at 147 where he looked like **** and fighting mosley after a long lay-off. these are all asterisks right?

    and let us go to the point where let's see which opponents should they have fought. for pacquiao, you cannot put to much names but for floyd, there are so much name we can put that we wish he should have fought.
     
  4. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    :lol: OH, yeah, COMMON sense coming from you. :patsch

    I am aware that Floyd fought two eliminators JUST to get to a titleholder in Gatti. And you think you made a point with that comment? :lol:

    You are literally one of the lamest posters here. If you honestly think Pac has 4 big wins, then you are just a waste of time. Do us all a favor, paint your walls in brain...thanks! :smooch
     
  5. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    No, you just repeat that bull****, and then go on to look for PAc fans to flame. You're just a phony as hell little **** blizz. You just use that excusre as a reason to avoid discussing **** you have no clue about. And you know that as a well. Just a little ***** waiting to be filled by floyd...
     
  6. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    he's the same guy that would say floyd has the better chin than margarito and when called on it, he would just pull those **** just to avoid debating those points. now he won't readily admit who has the better resume and would just flame and brand anyone a ******* if they would say anything unfavorable to floyd or anything that would answer pac even if we know the really obvious answer.
     
  7. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Blizz has been thoroughly exposed as a punk wannabe boxing expert. For all the times he cried about *******s and wanting to TALK ABOUT BOXING, he didn't give a **** about Floyd fanboys flaming away. In fact, he'd often join them. I pegged him as a fraud right away.
     
  8. Green Man

    Green Man Guest

    Terrible post.
     
  9. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    After a lot of votes im happy to see that a lot of posters know whats up.
     
  10. RightHandLead17

    RightHandLead17 Active Member Full Member

    1,447
    0
    Nov 11, 2010
    Pacquiao has never cleaned out a loaded division...every time he moves up he takes on the weakest champ :deal
     
  11. RightHandLead17

    RightHandLead17 Active Member Full Member

    1,447
    0
    Nov 11, 2010
    Again who is he? He's NEVER mention in the media or elsewhere :deal
     
  12. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    And? I hope you aren't suggesting since you never heard of him, or that he's not a common name means he wasn't good.

    And you are aware very, VERY few fighters in those light weights garner media or fan attention, let alone those not American.
     
  13. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    For a malnourished 19 year old kid to ko the lineal champ in his backyard is still impressive.
     
  14. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    I think Pacuaio resume is better name wise, yet when you look at the condition of his oppoennts at the time he fought them, you come to the conclusion that Floyds opponent were far better in terms of their condition and how much they had to give.
     
  15. globenerd

    globenerd Guest

    In comparing the two resumes as a whole, there's no debate for anyone who wants to look at it objectively. It's Pacquaio, clearly.
    But there's also no doubt, to anyone who wants to look at it objectively, that the last couple of years, Pac has taken a page from the Mayweather book of matchmaking, and cherry-picked his ass off.
    It's been 10 years since Floyd fought a "the" toughest test he couldn't have taken. It's now going on three years for Pac.
    No matter who you want to blame for these two not fighting (I personally blame Mayweather) you can't deny that the guys they've fought instead of each other were all crap opponents, and nowhere near the best guys they could have fought.

    And for their upcoming opponents, props to Mayweather for finally taking on a challenge. He's obviously the clear favorite, but at least it's a guy his own size, who is in his prime and will bring some heat.
    And **** on this Pacquiao-Marquez debacle. That fight is for nothing more than for *******s to line their hero's pockets a little bit more.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.