Can Prescott beat Mccloskey? and if he does should he get a shot at Khan?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by donizhere, Jul 24, 2011.


  1. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    He may not become super champ, Bradley is still considered by many to be the man, so if Presscott does become a mandatory for Khan's title, why shouldn't he get his shot?

    I'm sure you will come up with some new BS reasoning.
     
  2. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    3
    Jan 31, 2010
    What BS reasoning? You're talking as if Bradley has some sort of bearing on Khan being made Super Champ. It's the WBA that are in control of that so what the **** are you talking about? And I think he's already been made Super Champ and the Maidana/Guerrero fight is down as the regular title. So this thread is actually redundant.
     
  3. CASH_718

    CASH_718 "You ****ed Healy?" Full Member

    18,614
    8
    Apr 10, 2005
    Dont know too much about the ABC organizations do you?:patsch
     
  4. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,128
    2,767
    Jul 20, 2004
    He should fight him whether he beats or loses to McCloskey. I don't care if McCloskey knocks out Prescott under a minute either. If you're serious in the sport you MUST avenge a loss and Prescott has a very quick brutal win over Khan which can't be erased unless a rematch occurs. Lennox Lewis had that mentality 100% which made him great.
     
  5. johnnykoolkid

    johnnykoolkid Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,109
    0
    May 25, 2010
    well my point was that besides beating ATG Shane Mosley, what did he do?????

    exactly, R.I.P. Forrest, but still, so my point is that Forrest just had Mosley's number and Khan has top prove that Prescott doesn't have his, and hell, maybe we'll see a highlight real KO from Khan, and that should add to his credability ;)
     
  6. johnnykoolkid

    johnnykoolkid Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,109
    0
    May 25, 2010
    Pacquiao was 16 yrs old with little to no amateur experience, big difference
     
  7. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    3
    Jan 31, 2010
    Singsurat then. How about that?
     
  8. johnnykoolkid

    johnnykoolkid Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,109
    0
    May 25, 2010
    i don't even like Pacquiao's dog-eating ass, so you're hitting up the wrong boxing fan, i'm not these other dickfaces, i actually know other fighters other than Floyd and Pacquiao
     
  9. jack365

    jack365 Member Full Member

    484
    0
    May 21, 2010

    Mandatory is the ONLY reason Khan should fight him. Anyone urging Khan to fight him for any other reasons are being ****s.
     
  10. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    3
    Jan 31, 2010
    Why don't you answer my question? Does Singsurat deserve a rematch?
     
  11. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    I knew you would spew some BS, so let me ask you this, How long ago was that fight? Does Singsurat fight at 147? Is he about to become a mandatory for Pac's title?

    Do you see the difference?
     
  12. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    3
    Jan 31, 2010
    Why didn't you respond to my last rebuttal to your post?
     
  13. johnnykoolkid

    johnnykoolkid Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,109
    0
    May 25, 2010
    well maybe when Pac was still at that weight class, and was only a few fights removed from that fight
     
  14. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    3
    Jan 31, 2010
    That's fair enough. :good
     
  15. johnnykoolkid

    johnnykoolkid Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,109
    0
    May 25, 2010
    yea, cause i'm not gonna make any excuses for pacquiao, lolz :lol: