Amir Khan 1 Sky PPV 0

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Ace, Jul 26, 2011.


  1. Ace

    Ace Guest

    Amir Khan has turned the table on Sky PPV and that **** who we can't mention who tried his best to keep Khan off Sky PPV

    Sky I'm presuming were hoping Khan would lose his next few fights therefore be irrelevant in the UK, W@rren hoped Degale would shine and a new PPV star would be born. How wrong did they get it!

    Not only has Frank got NO PPV fighters left, neither Matchroom or any other UK outfit. David Haye has flopped, going from hero to zero, he won't get PPV figures like b4 which is great, good riddance to bad rubbish.

    The only man left standing is Khan and a relationship which can only get stronger with Primetime. Murdochs empire is crumbling anyway, it's about time their was some real competition out there.

    With Mayweather going to Primetime very likely, boxers like Froch and Haye will be p!ssed at Khan going to Primetime as he was going to build up there fights on Sky, as my previous posts predicted. There goes there future million £ PPV fights, Froch can thank Audley and Haye for this.

    Sky wanted Amir to promote Haye Wlad PPV while shortchanging Khan for a cool mil, that cocksucker Barney thought he could pull the wool over the eyes of Team Khan, how wrong he was.

    Sky you said you didn't make money off Boxing PPV, well you'll see now how true that is. Haye won't sell ****, Carl not established enough, you broke your bridges with Khan and it shows what a terrible move you've made.

    Khan stick with Primetime as GBP have your back, build your reputation in the States on HBO than go get some funding from some Sheikhs in the Middle East and start your own PPV network, this **** is easy.

    Primetime please raise the tone of quality for your next PPV, I want to see a bit of class, good promo videos, quality commentators, you have the ability to seriously take on Sky PPV here, so make a good job of it :good
     
  2. Scotty321

    Scotty321 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,516
    0
    Dec 21, 2008
    This is an uncalled for thread which is deliberately and maliciously aimed at making boxing4eva to take a maddie.

    I approve :good:yep
     
  3. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    30,856
    17
    Jul 1, 2006
    How about you tell your bumchum not to box on ppv at all then I might agree with you entirely
     
  4. somebody

    somebody Active Member Full Member

    686
    0
    Jan 1, 2011
    What are you smoking?

    Mayweather on Primetime?
    I doubt it. Sky would come in and take that fight and put it where it belongs.

    Khan is a klutz for losing Sky, no amount of spinning will change that.

    Primetime are cowboys, with a shonky service and a crap picture (if you are lucky enough to get a picture and not the Blue Screen of DOOM)

    Sky are a stand up outfit. Khan's management are not.

    SIMPLES
     
  5. Ace

    Ace Guest

    Sky PPV have no marquee fighters for a PPV. Deluding yourself into thinking they do is great, but the truth is the truth.

    Team Khan are no amateurs, they new the game Sky were playing from the start. Khan will do great with or without Sky. Sky will of course, BUT British fighters WON'T

    It will effect ****** Hearn and others by Khan NOT being on Sky PPV

    Barney and Adam will probably get their P45's and get a job putting posters up for Khan for his upcoming bout

    @Brown Bomber- is that you Tam Khan, anyway Khan is PPV, period.
     
  6. Jack Dempsey

    Jack Dempsey Legend Full Member

    7,210
    42
    Jun 13, 2005
    Is it true Sky are out of the PPV game until 2013??
     
  7. Ace

    Ace Guest

    I'm 25 and a multi millionaire in my field of internet marketing, you see those annoying ads all on this site, those popups on news24, well 50% of those are mine, I know a little about marketing

    Sky have got this totally wrong. It's the beginning of the end for them, thanks to the way they pissed off Khan
     
  8. liger05

    liger05 puroresu fan 4 life!! Full Member

    4,100
    21
    Nov 11, 2008
    I'm pretty sure the shareholders wont be disappointed with the Haye v Klit PPV revenue which is the equalivent of of what, 5 - 10 Khan fights?
     
  9. WalletInspector

    WalletInspector Obsessed with Boxing banned

    21,194
    2
    Jan 1, 2010
    No.
     
  10. somebody

    somebody Active Member Full Member

    686
    0
    Jan 1, 2011
    I don't get it. Why are "FANS" happy when their fighter is on PPV and why do they care about his money so much?

    I just want to see fighters fight and preferably not pay PPV. Why would you get excited about your fighter charging you money when you already pay £50 + a month to Sky?

    Someone explain this to me please.
     
  11. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    :lol:
     
  12. GlassJawAnalyst

    GlassJawAnalyst Active Member Full Member

    580
    0
    Aug 15, 2010
    Not one to side with PPV channels, but Khan has done well with Primetime, not exactly failed like some were expecting.
     
  13. Ace

    Ace Guest

    If I were a shareholder I would be pissed. This short sighted view some blamed Khan of, it seems Sky and their PPV execs have. Haye and Wlad was one major bout

    Khan is becoming a super star with MANY big fights in the future, burning your bridges so early in his career was not a good idea

    Barney should of taken his ego out of the equation when telling Khan to **** off, he's made a BIG mistake, not only him but ****** also.
     
  14. Jack Dempsey

    Jack Dempsey Legend Full Member

    7,210
    42
    Jun 13, 2005
    Ah ok, just heard it discussed on The Boxing Clever podcast
     
  15. rampant

    rampant Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,631
    9
    Feb 24, 2011
    I thinki its a fair comment and primetime have to start somewhere, if they improve they will attract more fights.

    Saying that I'd rather not have to pay any extra for any fight.

    Good on Khan and GBP a bit of competition for SKY does no harm.