Highest p4p: Julian Jackson or Trinidad?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bokaj, Jul 27, 2011.


  1. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,074
    12,977
    Jan 4, 2008
    Who you got and why?
     
  2. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    I say Trinidad. More dominant, the man in two weightclasses and only lost at his highest weightclasses and only against ATGs.
     
  3. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,874
    Apr 30, 2006
    I picked Jackson by mistake. Even though Oscar beat him, I still think Trinidad had the better career overall.
     
  4. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    64
    Dec 1, 2008
    Good comparison. Most people will say Trinidad because of his bigger fights, but Jackson knocked out a better bunch of guys than Tito did and I think has the better overrall resume. Somehow I do think Tito fights the top elite level better. Hard one to figure.
     
  5. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    50
    Sep 8, 2007
    the resume is where i'm getting stuck on. i love jackson but trinidad, right or wrong has wins over:

    oscar
    vargas
    campas (a VERY good campas)
    joppy (when still relevant)
    reid
    whitaker (shot)
    carr (**** it, i like carr)
    mayorga (well past prime and way too big)

    that's a pretty solid list of top wins. that's before bernard and then winky dominated the holy **** out of him and jones got the leftovers

    jackson has wins over:

    drayton (solid win but spectacular knockout)
    norris (his best win imo)
    graham (come from behind and greatest knockout i've ever seen)
    thomas tate

    jackson's resume is solid but it's his power and performances that give him his well earned reputation. on resume alone, i think trinidad is light years ahead. that, and jackson suffered the knockout to mccallum in his prime and at his best weight. trinidad was dominated by hopkins near the end of his prime but above his best weight, anything after that wasn't quite the same trinidad.
     
  6. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    64
    Dec 1, 2008
    it is a tough one. I forgot about Tito's win against Whitaker.. Yeah maybe you are right about Tito. Jackson either dispatched them or later struggled. Although the Graham knockout or Drayton or Norris is just incredible.
     
  7. Zopilote

    Zopilote Dinamita Full Member

    19,247
    20
    Dec 12, 2009
    Tito.

    Jackson KHTFO tho.
     
  8. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,074
    12,977
    Jan 4, 2008
    Why list Oscar as a win when Ttio was clearly beaten? Also, his win over Whitaker should count for about as much as Jones' over him. I e hardly at all.

    His best wins are then Vargas and Joppy. Do they beat Norris and Graham? Not so sure.
     
  9. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    264
    Jul 22, 2004
    The Norris win trumps anything on Tito's resume though, bar maybe DLH which we all know was a robbery, so don't count that. Other than that Trinidad's resume apears much better but I don't think there's that much in it

    Like you say Whitaker was shot, Vargas was good but not great. I'd certainly say Herol Graham is as good or better as any legit win of Trinidads. Carr was a good win though. I'm not sure Joppy is any better than Tate as a MW. Reid was a good win but flawed, Campas and Camacho both good solid wins

    Milton was a decent contender who beat McClellan that Jackson blasted out in 1. Drayton had only just lost his belt so would have been a unification if it happened earlier. Baek would go onto win a SMW strap. I don't think they are fantastic wins but decent ones none the less and emphatic

    As for dominance, Jackson went 7 years unbeaten as a champion, going 46-1, while being avoided by many. Trinidad on paper went 40-0 but in reality lost against DLH after a 6year reign. Neither truly proved themselves best in any division they fought

    I'd say it's pretty equal but Jackson was just flat out better and more devastating
     
  10. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Agree with PP as far as their resumes go, but I actually think Tito is a better fighter.

    Better chin, more will power, he never got blown out of the water like Jackson did against Mike and GMac.
     
  11. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    50
    Sep 8, 2007
    i agree but that's why i added "right or wrong" to the resume portion. oscar didn't lose and i don't count that much at all for tito but it is on his resume.

    if we're looking at more than the best wins, i feel trinidad certainly has more depth past the top 2. though vargas and joppy are comparable to norris and graham, beyond that jackson doesn't have a ton. if he had beaten mccallum, much different story
     
  12. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    50
    Sep 8, 2007
    mccallum hurts him for sure, more so than tito's lose to hopkins imo. tito was a machine at 147, appeared very good at 154 but was unproven at 160. meanwhile jackson was in his physical prime and best weight when he lost to mccallum.

    the loses to gman don't count all that much for me as jackson was noticably past prime, despite doing extremely well in the first fight before the knockout
     
  13. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,074
    12,977
    Jan 4, 2008
    I think that even can be seen in his favour. He came close to beating an extremely dangeroous puncher that was both younger and bigger than him.

    I don't get too hung up on whether there is W or an L in the margin; for me it's very much about the actual perfomance and the circumstances surrounding it. For example, Duran's loss to Hagler does more for Duran's standing in my eyes than it does for Hagler's, even though Hagler won clearly.
     
  14. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    50
    Sep 8, 2007
    fair point and post:good
     
  15. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    64
    Dec 1, 2008
    good argument. When you put it that way no Vargas and Joppy do not match Graham and Norris. Norris is a top 154 champion in the history of the weight, and Graham was a top 10 middleweight in 1985-95 era. The power of Jackson was the equalizer since if they fought the same guys, it seems like Tito could fight the top guys more evenly than Jackson could-unitl Julian landed his power.