More Impressive Resume: Froch Or Calzaghe

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by sp550i, Jul 27, 2011.


  1. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,568
    1,279
    May 31, 2010
    We'll see come November, but right now Slappy has the better wins. However, Froch is what 32/33 and still has a few more prime years left, and I could see him beating Ward, Kessler again, and even moving up and beating anyone at LHW which IMO is where he should be anyway. He's not the best SMW as long as Bute is around, and I think he rolls ALL the LHWs until BUTE moves up.
     
  2. Drinker

    Drinker Guest

    I give up.

    Froch's last win was against a 42-year-old with 13 defeats. He has lost 90% of his big fights.
     
  3. Dizzle

    Dizzle Active Member Full Member

    958
    0
    Sep 20, 2009
    Head to head I'd take Calzaghe every day of the week. Froch has a better resume though.
     
  4. christo

    christo Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,034
    107
    Sep 13, 2008
    This is another calzaghe hate thread. As of right now there's no
    debate as to calzaghe being the choice here. Simply from one
    fight. Calzaghe W Kessler, Kessler W Froch. Kessler was also in
    his prime and unbeaten when he lost a fairly wide decision to
    Joe. also, joe has a legit W over current 175 champ and ageless wonder
    bernard hopkins. Ward has a very similar, yet less entertaining, style to
    joe and it's hard to envision any other outcome than a Ward win over
    the cobra. So, after this year carl will have 2 of what joe never had,
    a loss.
     
  5. KO-KING

    KO-KING Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,539
    9
    Feb 15, 2011
    Calzaghe - Hopkins, Prime Kesslar. Bika, Sheika, Woodhall, Reid, Eubank and Lacy
    Froch - Pascal, Taylor, Dirrell, Johnson and Abraham

    Froch is on a great run but still behing Joe, Expect Froch to win on the poll votes becuase people are blinded by froch's current run, If you look deeper into his fights you will see Calzaghe's resume is still better
     
  6. bigG

    bigG Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,574
    18
    Dec 8, 2006
    i think calzaghes best ever win was v prime kessler.....and froch best performance was against prime kessler....so on results, at the minute, id have to say joe cal edges it..i also think in head to head joe wins..but im a bigger fan of froch and wouldnt be surprised if his achievements end up outsrtipping joes. his anywhere anytime attitude is one that joe didnt really have.
     
  7. ploys

    ploys New Member Full Member

    1
    0
    Mar 5, 2011
    it is calzaghe. but a lot of posters on esb don't know what they are talking about so they'll give it to froch. cos he is "under-rated" apparently.
     
  8. ploys

    ploys New Member Full Member

    1
    0
    Mar 5, 2011
    froch faced "prime" kessler...coming off a loss & complaining of double-vision?

    :huh
     
  9. bigG

    bigG Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,574
    18
    Dec 8, 2006
    yeah i will concede that the kessler cal beat was much the better, thats why i think it was his best ever win. i do still think kessler wastn far from his prime when froch fought him although i perhaps should have worded my post more accurately...
     
  10. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    20
    Sep 30, 2009
    I'll go with Calzaghe.

    Eubank was far more dangerous than any opponent Froch has fought. Prime Kessler is better than Pascal, Abraham or a shot Taylor or shot Johnson and far more dangerous than Dirrell. Brewer was more dangerous than any Froch opponent, too, just look what he did to Echols (who gave prime Hopkins so much hell). And Lacy was a dangerous puncher, too. And Mitchell a dangerous puncher. All genuine full super-middles, not blown-up like Taylor or Abraham. Then we have Hopkins, too, who went on to school Pascal.
     
  11. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    20
    Sep 30, 2009
    Calzaghe also fought a prime Reid, who went on to be robbed against Ottke. And Woodhall, who was dominating a prime Beyer after ring-rusty start, and Sheika, who just beat Johnson.

    Although I rate Brian Magee over Mark Delaney.
     
  12. rjko23

    rjko23 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,345
    1
    May 17, 2010
    froch beat brian magee. thats a better win than a shot robin reid.
     
  13. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    20
    Sep 30, 2009
    Froch is 34.

    He lost to Dirrell, he lost to Kessler, and he'll lose to Ward.
     
  14. Kingkazim

    Kingkazim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,806
    12
    Aug 26, 2009
    Calzaghes depth at this moment in time is just a nod above Froch. Zaghe's biggest wins were against Hopkins, Eubank and Kessler, he performed well in all three bouts. Froch's biggest wins are over Abraham, Taylor, and Pascal, these three fighters arent nearly as good as Hopkins, Eubank or Kessler

    That being said, due to Froch's consistency at the top level (beating Dirrel and Johnson), if Froch somehow manages to beat Ward in the S6 final, he will have leapfrogged over Calzaghes resume. And if Froch wins a title at LHW then its a no brainer
     
  15. rjko23

    rjko23 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,345
    1
    May 17, 2010
    you could make an argument that he drew both of them fights though. both estremly close and the kessler fight was away from home with a very loud danish crowd cheering kessler for every shot landed.

    carl has fought 6 world class opponents and not one has dominated him. he has been competitive with all of them and he beat abraham more convinsingly than ward and dirrell.

    froch has a better record than calzaghe imo.