I think of the fab four leonard and hagler give robinson the toughest fightest duran gets ktfo as does tommy, hearns is just a little to chinny to beat robinson
SRR wasnt as flashy as Leonard with the shoeshining, slappy combos, but where he was unmatched were those perfect precision combos. Lets not forget he was schooling a light heavyweight before he got dehydrated by the hot weather that day. You dont see many WWs doing that. I think Robinson wins by SD hes too much of a complete fighter for anyone at 147. He was tall at 5 11. Had Tommy Hearns ko power with Haglers iron chin and Leonards adaptability. Bert Sugar my ass Robinson was always considered the greatest.
Leonard was so exceptional I doubt it would be easy for SRR. I would pick SRR, but it might be close. Ray would definetly have to go for the knockout. He would not win a decision.
I'd pick Robinson but not by much, I'd say it's 60/40 really..The people who think it would be easy for Robinson are idiots though, Leonard could give anyone trouble
Okay.. I will be honest and say that i have never seen SRR fight.. But based on articles, comments and whatever i have heard.. I would say that SRR would be able to outmaul Leonard and win a decision, based on his toughness..
eh tough to say. at ww tommy is generally excepted as the hardest puncher sinve there is next to no footage at sugar ray. but yes a better combo puncher but tommy had the better jab and maybe just as fast if.not faster
theres a period or two where it wasnt supposed to.be. im writing from my phone so sue. either way this isnt gramatically correct forum. its a boxing forum, try talkin boxing one of these days
it seems like the older the fighter the more unbeatable he becomes on here.....anyways i think SRL has a damn good chance at winning this fight.