Calzaghe must be top 10 atg ?

i do have a terrible attitude. i tell ******s they are ******s.

& welsh = welsh.

 

Yeah he got the decision, 46-0 baby. 45 have tried, 45 have failed.

 

in fact...you replied to my point to say: "a while ago i disagreed with you...but i don't remember now...i will however argue to the death to defend this opinion i don't remember & i refuse to discuss specifics..."

twat. :good

 

no...i mean...you said reid took over after rd 5...but by that point calzaghe only needed 2 rds to win...& you think he did that...so you think he won?

 

I gave my summary and you found my scorecard, what more do you want? I'll make this point clear for you: I. Have. Not. Watched. This. Fight. In. Ages.

You're neither respected enough, relevant enough nor nice enough for me to rewatch the fight and tell you how I see it after rewatching it.

Maybe if you weren't as idiotic i'd treat you with more respect and debate this with you. As it is, read the thread you found my scorecard on.

 

I aint arguing to the death nor defending. I've made it clear to you that I care not how you view me, my posts or my scorecard. I'm just responding to whatever it is you post

 

Calzaghe clearly beat Reid, no doubt, unless you are called Lufcrazy.
Lufcrazy thinks beating Abraham coming off a clear loss, Taylor one fight removed from a clear loss, No big wins Dirrell, Pascal who did nothing and couldnt beat a 46 year old Calzaghe victim, and more losses than wins at SMW Johnson equate to better wins than whats on Calzaghes resume .
Pascal not as accomplished a SMW as Veit
Dirrell not as accomplished a SMW as Mkertchyan
Taylor not as accomplished a SMW as Mitchell
Kessler lost to Calzaghe, coming off a loss beats Froch
Abraham coming off a loss isnt as accomplished a SMW as Woodhall
Johnson isnt as accomplished a SMW as Lacy not to mention how Calzaghe gets slated for beating 7 years older Hopkins, but it gets forgotten Johnson was 8 years older and has double figure losses.
Add that Calzaghe also beat Reid a more accomplished SMW, Kessler a more accomplished SMW, Eubank a more accomplished SMW, Hopkins and Jones.

Now Lufc will hide from this post and site troll whilst trolling

 

i want you to back up your opinion or **** off. :good

then either watch the fight or, if you do not feel confident enough in your memory to discuss it now, stop discussing it.

hit me where it hurts. how "respected" i am on the internet.

i expect stuff like that actually does mean a lot to a special needs counting teacher.

dude...i don't care anymore. i'm trying to discuss the fight...you don't want to for whatever reason: then what are you posting for?

 

respond to this;

how do you justify scoring round 1 or round 7 as reid rounds.

i'll wait.

i'm sure you'll actually just respond with a load of off-topic bollocks tho. :nut

 

I'd love bailey to point out where i've trolled. Also betrayed himself since I left out johnson from my list of froch's victories in anticipation of his usual cut and paste.

Ploys, next time I watch it, i'll get back to you now please buzz off and annoy someone else

 

:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy

 

@bailey, he asked me to debate, i said when i watch it next i will. not sure how that's trolling :-(

 

i actually am re-watching the fight now, 1080hd on youtube my speaker don't got monitors tho so it's soundless.

have patience and your answers will be here in approx 30 minutes since i'm upto round 3 atm.

 

@ bailey, how did i lie? he is 46-0 isn't he. 45 guys have failed to officially beat him. where is the lie?