Better fighter p4p? Amir Khan or Chad Dawson

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MAG1965, Jul 29, 2011.


  1. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
  2. The Clan

    The Clan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,501
    2,087
    Nov 11, 2007
    Khan

    And scarily, he's no where near his peak!
     
  3. badassQatari

    badassQatari Active Member Full Member

    858
    0
    Mar 13, 2011
    khan.
    given his recent runs, the prescott KO is forgivable
     
  4. Green Man

    Green Man Guest

    At this point its Khan.
     
  5. teddybaldock

    teddybaldock Active Member Full Member

    989
    866
    Oct 18, 2010
    Khan at this stage.... whats Dawson doing these days haven't seen him in the yanks p4p lists for a while
     
  6. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    Khan right now, but Dawson if he returns to form and beats hopkins will be higher. overall dawsons quite a bit better but he's been doing it twice as long. people forget ring had dawson #3 or 4 pound for pound before he lost to Pascal.
     
  7. Ripper11

    Ripper11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    2
    Apr 21, 2011
    at this point of time, Khan, but if Dawson wins against Bernard, I got Dawson
     
  8. IRONSENSE2002

    IRONSENSE2002 muslim and proud Full Member

    5,383
    1
    Jul 27, 2010
    holding a win over adamek and beating traver twice is better then anything khans done, the adamek on its own is far greater to beating maidana,malinaggi,kotelnik or zab
     
  9. Mook

    Mook Member Full Member

    485
    0
    Nov 18, 2005
    IronSense, I disagree that beating Adamek on its own is greater than anything Khan has done, otherwise Tarver still beats everyone for having a win over a seemingly indestructible RJJ. (Also, Adamek really has done nothing of note at heavy, a very impressive Arreola performance excepted).

    Khan's current run, given the frequency as well, has to put him above Dawson. Of course, if we went for the old meaning of p4p, who would beat who at the same weight, Dawson might well have an argument. That said, I think Khan is proving to be the talent we all believed he was at 17.
     
  10. DDDUUDDDEE

    DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

    17,608
    23
    Oct 25, 2010
    This.
     
  11. lolercakes

    lolercakes Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,164
    27
    Apr 16, 2011
    Khan, dawson blew it vs pascal and looked terrible against diaconu
     
  12. Joan_Guzman

    Joan_Guzman Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,244
    0
    Apr 3, 2010
    Dawson easily. Khan has fought hand picked opponents and none are of the elite level. Like Adamek was. Not to mention Johnson, Tarver and Diaconu are more accomplished than Paulie, Salita and Prescott
     
  13. Arcane

    Arcane One More Time Full Member

    15,277
    20
    Oct 23, 2010
    Terrific story bro :rofl

    I do wonder how silly this post will look after Vitali beats seven bells of **** of Adamek.
     
  14. sugar_boy

    sugar_boy New Member Full Member

    88
    0
    Jun 28, 2010
    Nice how you say Khan has fought hand picked opponents but leave out his dangerous opponents, Maidana and Judah (who I believe you predicted would knock Khan out) :roll:
     
  15. DDDUUDDDEE

    DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

    17,608
    23
    Oct 25, 2010
    Oh FFS, here comes the "Khan handpicks opponents" bull**** again. I swear some of you people are technically ******ed or something, it's the only explanation.