Wlad will never actually be heavyweight champion

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by kute, Jul 29, 2011.


  1. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    It doesn't matter how / why? Then why do you say he's ducking his brother when his own brother has said he won't fight him either? :patsch



    Were being trolled.
     
  2. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    **** you troll.

    Unifying is two or more. Not all 4 major titles.
     
  3. kute

    kute Guest

    How am I supposed to call a man the heavyweight champion of the world when he can't fight the only other credible contender of his era?
     
  4. kute

    kute Guest


    Thanks for the dictionary definition of unifying. Yes it is 2 things coming together. I guess Wlad doesn't need to beat the best in the world, to claim the historically most legitimate piece of the unification puzzle. We can safely call him heavyweight champion. I mean he'd probably beat Vitaly
     
  5. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    How is he suppose to beat Vitali when Vitali said himself he won't fight Wlad?
     
  6. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Good for you (No sarcasm). :happy
     
  7. LittleHarry

    LittleHarry New Member Full Member

    64
    0
    Jul 13, 2011
    I have Vitali ranked #1!
     
  8. darling dame

    darling dame Active Member Full Member

    1,070
    3
    Dec 8, 2009
    Even if Wlad was not champ he could be rated against others as good great poor. Sam Langford was rated #8 all-time by nat fleischer RING mag. It is regarded as a authority ,although it was done in 1959. Tom & mike gibbons never champs rated in LH&middle,Dixie Kid rated #5 welter,also Harry &Willie Lewis rated top 10 welters.:bbb
     
  9. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    dont come on this ****ing board with your under 20 posts and start a thread thats this stupid....****ing moron
     
  10. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    Obvious troll is obvious, etc.
     
  11. 1 belt

    1 belt Soviet assault Full Member

    256
    2
    Jun 17, 2010
    Two brothers don't fight in a bloodsport stupid.Ricky Hatton never called out his brother,and George Foreman never had to prove himself by calling out his son.
     
  12. tolindoy

    tolindoy UBESTRIDTE MESTER Full Member

    6,396
    0
    Jan 22, 2009
    and EZE got punked...poor *******..:lol::rofl
     
  13. kute

    kute Guest

    How is this trolling? He is not heavyweight champion of the world, because he cannot fight his brother. What's not to understand. Whether that's a legitimate excuse or not, the fact is, he cannot fight the only major player in the division other than himself. HOW CAN HE BE CALLED THE CHAMPION OF THE WORLD. HE CAN'T EVEN CALL HIMSELF CHAMPION OF HIS FAMILY.

    For the record, I think he'd beat Vitaly.
     
  14. kute

    kute Guest

    Was Foremans son a major belt holder and the only other guy in the division worth a damn?

    The Klitschko's dual excellence has raised this interesting conundrum where they cannot name themselves heavyweight champ, they both hold belts, and they cannot fight each other.
     
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,797
    22,031
    Sep 15, 2009
    Only a small minority don't believe he's champion so the whole point is moot anyways.

    Holmes never unified, he got his claim by beating a retired man riddled with parkinson's. Many different ways to establish a new lineage.