Controversial statements on boxing that you stand by...

Marvin Hart took a legitimate defense of his title. Johnson didn't until Jeffries. More than Hart, granted, but the insane amount of manipulation of Johnson during his reign is so disgraceful that I deem it inferior.

 

I fully agree with this. He'd have beaten any version of Benn too.

 

Only reason why people complain about Heavyweight division is because there is no Yanks/Brits dominating for the first time.

 

Skip to 3.21

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juTRNuehRhk&t=3m21s[/ame]

 

Cheers Slap never seen that before. Obviously Barker should have been disqualified but 'defend yourself at all times'.

 

Eubank won the first fight.

 

the gatti ward trilogy is highly overrated vasquez/marquez blows it away.frank bruno beats haye.boxing historians only look at the past with rose tinted glasses not every fighter was elite in the old days it was just like today there were good,bad and great fighters

 

Mike Tyson is very very overrated
Roberto Duran is the best all round fighter of all time
Lennox Lewis would have given ANY heavyweight in history problems

 

If Wladimir Klitschko fought in any division with a weight limit using that style and skillset he would be nothing special.

 

:huh

What would the limit be though? I don't see anyone over 240 lbs that would beat him?

 

I'm sure Shaun-o means if you scaled him down to a LHW or whatever. :good

 

What I mean is that it's his physical size that allows him to fight with that style and only in the heavyweight division is a fighter permitted such a size advantage. If he loses this advantages he gets knocked out.

 

In your opinion he did:hey

Collins would it fair and square in my opinion:good

 

Yes, that's exactly it.

Cheers :good

 

Riddick Bowe at his best had the ability to beat any heavyweight in history:deal