Should there be a distinction between a victory by cuts and by TKO

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by awesome1612, Aug 3, 2011.

  1. awesome1612

    awesome1612 Guest

    TKO usually always implies that the ref had to jump in to save the fighter from a barrage of punches that the fighter simply could not defend himself with meaning the fighter was simply just being dominated and outboxed.

    One example of where this goes wrong is the Vitali Klitschko - Lennox Lewis fight. Vitali was the one who was dominating and outboxing Lewis and by many boxing experts and fans was thought to win the fight in the later rounds. His loss is labeled as "TKO" but this is really not the case.

    And there are distinctions already made in boxing, I don't see why "Cuts" can't be added in? Besides TKO and KO, RTD is a distinction used for being retired by the corner. Thus, a fight stopped by the doctor's advice should be a victory by Cuts or it can be abbreviated to look cool.
     
  2. awesome1612

    awesome1612 Guest

    Oh and I, of course, voted yes
     
  3. Libertine

    Libertine Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2010
    Messages:
    821
    Likes Received:
    427
    Yes, but well done in using a terrible example
     
  4. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    51,943
    Likes Received:
    2
    No. A loss is a loss. A stoppage on cuts already has a label, it's TKO.

    And yes, Vitali really did lose. Punches made the cut. Punched made it worse. Punches stopped it.
     
  5. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    13,939
    Likes Received:
    4
    I think it would be nice to have it noted somewhere on sites that have wins/losses. But a cut stoppage is a TKO, the ref determined the fighter could not defend himself, due to the cut/s.
     
  6. Rangersfan1982

    Rangersfan1982 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    Messages:
    3,832
    Likes Received:
    1
    Get over it you sad ****.
     
  7. Ripper11

    Ripper11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    9,475
    Likes Received:
    2
    :thumbsup
     
  8. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    22,661
    Likes Received:
    4

    :deal

    jesus, get over Vitali getting owned by fat old ass out of shape Lewis already, knew this thread had an agenda......
     
  9. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2010
    Messages:
    8,724
    Likes Received:
    4,429
    If a fight is stopped on cuts it should be ruled a Technical Decision (TD), not a TKO.
     
  10. TitoMahawk

    TitoMahawk Retarded trolls detector Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2011
    Messages:
    2,381
    Likes Received:
    0
    THe example is so bad I won't vote.
     
  11. gobblock

    gobblock Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2009
    Messages:
    5,623
    Likes Received:
    1
    No. Fans can remember the details behind a stoppage to detemine when a rematch is warranted. In your example, it was warranted. It's still a TKO.
     
  12. Ding

    Ding Champ Full Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2006
    Messages:
    972
    Likes Received:
    0

    :deal
     
  13. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    Messages:
    123,070
    Likes Received:
    35,189
    Great post I agree.
     
  14. Blizz42

    Blizz42 Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    4,504
    Likes Received:
    0
    Vitali was not dominating Lewis. A fight is 12 rounds, and predicting Vitali wins late is just that, a prediction. The problem with what you're saying is that the cuts weren't caused by himself. Lennox caused the cuts.
     
  15. Vidic

    Vidic Rest in Peace Manny Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2010
    Messages:
    13,207
    Likes Received:
    11
    No, TKO stands for technical knockout.

    This is when one fighter continuing the bout would be unsafe, be it because of obtuse cuts or inability to defend himself.