Bob Fitzsimmons vs Joe Frazier

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SonnyListonsJab, Jul 31, 2011.


  1. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    true and this unfortunately works both ways. possibly great fighters are dismissed because of incomplete or inaccurate records and possibly mediocre fighters are built up because of the era in which they fought and their air of mystery adds a mythical quality that can be mistaken for greatness.
     
  2. janwalshs

    janwalshs Active Member Full Member

    625
    214
    Feb 19, 2010
    A re-enactment of Joe's fight with Dave Zieglywiycz, or however he spelt his name. What was Fitz, about 5'8" and 170 lbs?
     
  3. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Fitz was about the same height as Joe- possibly a shade taller. Joe would've had about 30 pounds on him, though.
     
  4. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,914
    44,736
    Apr 27, 2005
  5. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    The correct terminology for the time is,

    "What ho, old chap? Smack me in the slats, why dontcha?"
     
  6. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,914
    44,736
    Apr 27, 2005
    :lol:
     
  7. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    :lol::deal
     
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,785
    46,474
    Feb 11, 2005
    Don't sock him in his wind!
     
  9. gentleman jim

    gentleman jim gentleman jim Full Member

    1,640
    56
    Jan 15, 2010
    I just can't picture Fitszimmons beating a threshing machine in prime Joe Frazier. Joe at 205lbs had nearly 40 solid pounds on Fitz but he moved even quicker on the attack and was somewhat difficult to hit with his bob and weave style. If Joe could beat a six foot three 215lb near prime and very fleet footed Ali I shudder to think what he would do to Fitz. Bob fought in a different era when boxing was still developing. Plus there simply weren't as many good big men around as there were during Fraziers' time. Big men who were fast as well as skilled. What would the reporters of Bobs' time say if we time machined Ali, Foreman, Quarry, Bugner, Norton, Liston etc. back to Fitz' era. Bob was quite a fighter, no question. But I think we have to really put things in perspective here. Foreman kept decking a somewhat past it Frazier and Joe kept getting back up...George was a 6'3" and 220 lb wrecking ball. Does anybody really see a 167lb man keeping Joe down for the count?
     
  10. Pachilles

    Pachilles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,294
    28
    Nov 15, 2009
    Janitor, hank, thistle1, beinstock, rockysplitnose and Boilermaker
     
  11. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    I never said that I thought Fitz would win. I just said it was ridiculous to expect Joe to win in two rounds.
     
  12. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,914
    44,736
    Apr 27, 2005
    Whi is it ridiculous when he starched Foster in 2? Foster gave Ali hell early.
     
  13. yancey

    yancey Active Member Full Member

    1,487
    58
    Nov 28, 2007


    I suspect you know quite a bit about "daze".

    :yep
     
  14. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    Because Foster isn't a patch on Fitzsimmons overall. And as a heavyweight there is absolutely no comparison who did better against bigger and well ranked opposition.
     
  15. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    deleted wrong thread