The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

since david diaz in 2008, pac has had 7 fights And only lost round 2-3 rounds in those 7 fights. mayweather has had 2 fight in the same time period, 3 if u want to count his hatton fight in 2007. how many round has fmj lost in his last 3 fights? compare it to pacs 3 last fights, if u want to make it harder for pac. then compare pacs 7 fight to fmjs 3. how many round did each lose?

Pacs more versatile than ppl think, its not about the style and technical prowess of one boxer over the other. pacs has also had 2 tkos , 1 ko and 1 retired in 7 fight. fmjs hads 5 decisions and 1 tko in his last 6 fight (2006 onwards).

If you go by round won/lost pacs more versatile. Pac has also ended his fights more emphatically than fmj. Anyone calln someon a ****** for picking pac should really look in the mirror

 

WHAT THE **** does that have to do with being versatile? Talk about his actual style, not whatever you were talking about.
Maybe that's why you went with the wrong answer

 

There I bolded to make it easy for you. Versatility is NOT equal to style. Versatility is being able to adjust and beat your opponent. And beat him good

Its not just about FMJs potshotting style... which (the style) is not as versatile as a boxer who can also fight with range and has the ability to knock you the **** out.

Pacs a better boxer and is a smarter technician than the people in this thread give him credit for

 

no that still doesn't make sense. Vitali has lost even less rounds than Pacquiao and Floyd and has more KO's but he's most one dimensional than the both of them.

 

This is between floyd vs Pac versatility - stick to the topic dumbass

Dont compare the heavyweight division to Pacs and floyds division. Your examples a bit extreme lol

Pac and Floyd divisions are alot stronger and they also have common opponents. If you see how those went Pac still wins out...

 

I'm giving that as an example dumbass :tired

explain Pac's versatility to me. What makes what he does versatile? Don't say he won 11 rounds in the fight as evidence. Explain to me how he won a fight and changed his approach up or how he won a fight and then used a different approach to another fight

 

Dude, but your example is void like void when you using a CURRENT heavyweight fighter in the worst division in boxing and comparing it to the best division in boxing(no offence to boxing Hw fans)

Pacs fought more, lost less. Has lost less rounds because of his ability to win and adjust. Where as Fmj has lost rounds and have only been able to decision most of his opponent.

Can YOU honestly say Pac has Won 53 fights because hes not versatile?

Pac has also jumped weights and Dominated more fighters than FMJ in the last 4 years. Can you say that Fmjs had a better 4 years?

Pac was awarded Boxer of the DECADE in the SAME era that Fmj plyed his trade.

So yes Pac is way more versatile

 

emmanuel is an offensive specialist with a toy jab, zero inside fighting game, and is unable to cut off a damn boxing ring.

He needs to go back and focus on his offense instead of worrying about being versatile for his fans' sakes.

 

yes Pac is versatile, but he's not more versatile than Floyd and you haven't explain why either. You just said he's knokced more guys out and that really has nothing to do with it.

If you want to argue if Pacquiao is the better fighter overall, then I can see your arguement making sense, but this has nothing to do with versatility man.

 

Manny deals with infighting very well. he adjusts and knows how to counter infighters and huggers. look at what happened to opponents that tried to smother pac. his jab is more of a setup for most combos but he also uses his left as a make shift jab all the time and have broken down good jabbers with it. its hard to say if manny cant cut off the ring. no ones has run away from void lately.like some have run from pac

 

dickhead

if i was a professional boxer and fought shite oponents until i had 50 fights without losing a round you would think im the most versatile fighter ever your a complete moron

 

I thought I was going crazy for a second when I read his reasoning :yep

 

Pac was massive favourite for his last three or four fights of course hes going to look great against sure thing victories!!!

whens last time manny fought slick southpaw?

 

seriously some Pac fans are going to make me hate him!!! its unbelievable what some of these people come out with.

i think Pac and Floyd will be 50 50 probably why we will never see it.

 

You still missing it bro, being versatile means ad ******g to whats infront of you, and since pac has better round/win ratio then that makes him more versatile. It means he adjust quicker to his opponents and has lost less rounds because of this. The fact that he Kos guys more often proves that pac not only adjust better but capitalises more on his opponents mistakes compared to floyd. That Makes him more versatile

When it comes to D , Pac has also been hit less when it comes to common opponents (hatton/mosely)

I think your lost on the meaning of versatility tbh