The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

your a ****ing disgracefully slow individual.

i nevr said pac fought 50 bums in a row your a lying piece of trash.

 

de la hoya. and not many more (hatton was 50 50 in uk for betting i know i clened up bettingon floyd, amir khan and John dudd all to win in same night(diff venues).

look i dont want to argue with you but you said winning more rounds shows he more versatile it doesnt.
it implies that his original tactics are working properly.

you havent been able to give me one example your pathetic.

 

so explain why you said the last qoute about 50 fights without losing a round, if pac didnt line up them bums then why would you bring that statement into the equation ?

We know pac didnt, so how would you assume my logic was as basic as your above qoute ..

Whos got the better resume in your eyes?

 

SERIOUSLY MAN IVE ALREADY SAID THAT WASNT ABOUT PACQUIAO!!! IVE HAD TO SAY THIS MULTIPLE TIMES TO YOU. WINNING MORE ROUNDS ON AVERAGE DOESNT MAKE YOU MORE VERSATILE. OK HAVE YOU GOT THIS.

MY EXAMPLE WAS IF I THATS ****ING RIGHT I WON FIFTY FIGHTS IN A ROW FIGHTING BUMS AND WINNING EVERY ROUND DOES THAT MAKE ME THE MOST VERSATILE FIGHTER EVER?

NO IT DOESNT.

WHY YOU UPSET THAT I THINK FLOYD IS MORE VERSATILE THAN PAC??

ITS NOT HATING I THINK mALIGNAGGI IS MORE VERSATILE THAN HATTON AND HATTON KNOCKED THE **** OUT OF HIM!!

YOU NOW FINALLY KNOW WHAT IM SAYING?

 

i think PAC has better resume over all. and i think he is less versatile.

this might be hard for you to understand but i think thats why pac is so popular hes not perfect, he fights hard and takes more risks.generally more exciting to watch(as long as opponent isnt overmatched)

he has fought better comp(getting worse under arum like floyd when he was promoting him)

 

if pac beat floyd, does pac more versatile than floyd?

versatility doesnt make sense in boxing. boxers/fighters go out there to beat their opponent whichever way they can either by taking advantage of their opponents weaknesses or by imposing their strengths to their advantage.

malignaggi is could be more versatile than pac, but that *** lost most of his big fights.

 

where did you go evilsherwin?? instead of admitting your wrong you just **** off? not on

 

Pacs popular, because hes humble, he was quite flawed to begin with, ppl warmed to pac coz he took alot of risk and won fights with that he meant to have no business being in. Hence the thread upon thread of *******s bringing up old **** about pac getting kod by ppl north of 135.. but guess what, pac won and won handsomely

You just cant say an inactive boxer is more versatile than an active boxer who takes more risks and overcomes them. Floyd needs to take the test of his career and fight Pac, If pac wasnt so versatile and such an under dog why would FMJ and his fam talk about pac on roids and power pellets?

If mayweather was more active and fought higher calibre fighters than pac and won then I would say yea , mayweather is more versatile, As of now, Pac has beaten the better fighters and have been more consistent and tested.

Versatility is not about style, it the adjustments you make to beat your opponent. And Pac has done that, not only done it , but head to head done it better than FMj. Stats dont lie, go have a look

Not upset son, on the contrary... Im laughing my head off with the **** you come up with. Dont say ppl are angry when you urself are typing in CAPS

Tell me how a losing fighter is more versatile than the winner of the fight, if he was so versatile then why didnt he adjust if he was losing the fight? if it was a lucky ko, then why didnt he rematch? You gotta adjust and win to be versatile, dont adjust = loss and not versatile

Just picked up the misus and had some dinner

 

They are both versatile of course!

 

im writing in caps in the hope you can understand me. i never said manny fought 50 bums in a row and you said that i had.i dont like being accused of **** i havent done.

i went to lengths multiple times to point this out to you.

humble is great but not if you fight boring. Mannys popular because he fights like a tornado. if he was aprick id still think he was exciting to watch,

I get it man you love Manny Pacquiao.

good for you.

i know you think manny would ko prime tyson but sometimes you need to just take step back and realise that boxing was around before Pac

Pac couldnt adjust to Mosely fighting for the 12 round bell and didnt seem to know how to cut the ring off effectively and also against Morales inthe first fight he lloked awkward going backwards.

Floyd is probably the most versatile boxer out there(boxing bigger man de la hoya, roughing up inside fighter in Hatton. bullying the bully in MOSELY


does your missus like being a third wheel to Manny?

 

I didnt accuse you, mainly pointed out that your point was moot as it had nothing to do with pac, I was directly quoting pacs resume and you come in talking about a "pro boxer fighting bums" So to end your misconception read this. A Pro fighter fighting bums has nothing to do with Pacs resume I agree with you.. but dont assume I think so which I have TOLD you already

Not just about excitement, people like humble champs better.

Hypocrite much? When did I say this lol :rofl And I was a fan of boxing way before pac. So go on keep making up more facts to make yourself feel better

Pac kds mosely in the 3rd round, mosely ran for his life for the rest of the night. Did he run like that against Floyd? No one looks good with a negative fighter , believe or not it was a dominating win, not one round given to mosely. How many rounds did mosely win against floyd?

Eric morales was 6 years ago and nearly 10 fight ago I thnk, Pac came back and beat him remember, 2nd fight , pac got his right going, 3rd fight, PAc used his feet better and made Morales quit! you see morales's last fight with Maidana??

Pac left dlh clue less, his trainer told him to quit. Before you bring up weight drained, Dlh or his coach have said that the weight was not the problem. It was the fast hands and in and out movement.. Where as FMJ got a sd

Manny kds hatton twice, ad******g to hatton inside game quicktime, then finally retires hatton for good on the 2nd round.

Yes thanks for bringing up my missus, dont worry shes happy :good

 

Floyd is more versatile. But of course, that doesn't mean he beats Pacquiao if they fight. The versatile fighter does not always win, even if he tries to adapt mid-fight, because the other fighter's A-game could be too much for him, or could just be a bad stylistic match no matter what.

 

At the end of the Day, You cant say FMJ is more versatile when he has not been tested, taken as many risks and won compared to Pac

This is the truth, no trolling. You CANT be the most versatile when there are others who have taken on bigger challenges and won (last 4 years of both boxers resume ).

 

I guess I'm gullible. Have you ever listened to Floyd's corner instructions? It's all "emotional" support. It has very little to do with technical or strategic instructions. Grant it...most of the time Floyds in control...but even in rounds he loses... It's Floyd who re-sets and adjusts.

For Floyd to "study" for a fighter would be counter productive for the kind of mentality Floyd has. He knows enough about his opponents from watching the fights on TV. He's a guy who claims to have seen all the styles and has the remedy for every last one of them.

Gullible in life.... you are confused homie.

 

Draw