The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

:think

 

Man see we keep getting on you because you are talking about something completely different. You're just saying, Manny won his fights more dominatly so he must be versatile.
Well don't say that, explain to me specifically what he did in the fight to be versatile. How come a lot of you Pacquiao fans can never talk boxing and break down fights like this.

Example of versatility: Sugar Ray Leonard came into the fight with Hearns as the pure boxer who stayed on his toes and boxed while Hearns was the puncher. Hearns used his length and jab and started to out box Leonard from the outside. So Leonard goes into stalking mode and starts standing more flat footed and starts pressuring Hearns and eventually knocks him out.
That is versatilty on both of their parts and more so Leonard. atsch Please give me something like that

 

atschatschatsch no man no. The more versatile man isn't necessarily the better fighter. I think Andre Ward is way more versatile than Pacquiao, but I don't think he's better.
Would you say that Ward can't be more versatile because he hasn't fought as good as opposition? :nut

 

That's not always true.

Against Oscar he told Floyd:

Roger: "Keep tapping him with the jab, down the stretch you gonna get his ass. Don't worry down the stretch, let the ***** get tired a bit. He ain't doing **** anyway, he just walking in.
Keep the jab working, keep the feint working and stay off the rope when you don't have to. Every now then get on it, but don't stay on the ropes for so long :hey"

 

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

:happy yay the town idiot showed up.
First off I post in the training section all the time. I have a thread started on the first page right now :nono

Also read all my posts in the thread and the examples I give. Floyd fans and neutral fans have given reasons wy Floyd is more versatile.

Look at the guys who voted Manny and tell me they aren't biased. This forum is Pro Pacquiao, but he's getting killed in this thread. Floyd fans, neutral fans and half of Pacquiao fans think Floyd is more versatile

 

Like who else who you expect from these guys

manny

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

,

This content is protected

 

I've noticed that Floyd does get better advice in his corner whenever he's in fights that he's actually losing rounds. JLC, DLH, Hatton....all saw Floyd's corner show their intelligence.

 

Cant win the argumet so you resort to argumentum ad populum, and call me the idiot.

Boxing is the sweet SCIENCE and as we all know

This content is protected

I'll make your dumb ass run from this thread like you did the last.

 

look at my post above that one dumbass

 

floyd is way better

 

I agree with what you say and have even posted stats to directly compare the two, all I get in response is how about vitali, jersey shore & andre ward. All stupid examples that are not required when we are comparing 2 fighters who have common opponents , era and weight range.

Yes its hard to believe Pac is more versatile as it goes against the grain. I think people are confusing FMJs Versatility with his technical ability.

People think just because pacs an unorthodox fighter that hes just a fast left hand happy south paw brawler. Not the case at all , if YOU look at the fight I have qouted above

 

This content is protected

 

What a ****ing stupid outlook:rofl. You do no justice for either fighter

 

atsch remember this next time you freak out over me just asking you a simple boxing related question... You seem to have no qualms sending insults of your own.:roll: