The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

he came right into the thread talking ****, so I did it back :good

 

I'm a ***** for wanting different people to answer my question.

This content is protected

Follow the advice of the wise guy quotes you share and preach to us, stupid ****.

 

And yet, even when I don't talk **** to you you still freak out.

 

how about you reply to what I said instead of whatever you did there :verysad

 

who's more versatile?
Andre Ward or Manny Pacquiao?

Please answer and no BS. I'm not asking who is better? I'm asking who is more versatile.

 

First answer this

Is to be MORE Versatile to be better? than lets say a less versatile person?

who wins "Most versatile vs Less Versatile"

Is it a fair comparison when one Boxer has won over more technically skilled fighter and has beaten harder opponents?

have a go

Hint: Ppl can look more versatile when they are fighting lesser opponents

 

To admit Floyd is more versatile in some way is like saying he's better than Pac and these tards wont admit to that because their brains will explode. Fact is, Floyd is more versatile his approach.



When guys come forward he can eat them up for breakfast, brunch, lunch, snack, dinner and dessert. Yet when people give him just a tad of footwork he does nothing


Look at how Mosely faced him. The crowd was ****ing booing and how can the favorite not put away an old fighter if he's supposed to have this great KO power? How can a versatile man not put him away. Great footwork? Where was it when it came down to cornering Shane and dumping him with punches??

 

Floyd gone kill Manny cuh!! Pac dun wont it wit da TREEEELEST n da game mane. Pretty Boy Floyd gone make it rain on Jinkee BEEETCH!!! Buboy gone **** Ellerbe tho

 

****ing nobody respects you. Did you even give your opinion Yo, did this puss filled lump of **** give his opinion or did he do his usual, ******* a *****

 

a versatile fighter doesn't need to put his opponents away. He can win a shutout or have someone seeing stars after just 2 rounds. That's what being versatile is all about. Pac doesn't need a knockout to dominate fights, and he doesn't need to win on points either. He can dominate both ways and using different approaches.

 

Who are you talking to? You seem to ask the board questions, as if anyone gives a **** what you say? atsch

You can think no one respects me if you want, it makes you happy to believe that. That's what insecure little ****s like you do, create your own reality devoid of truth.

 

It's better to be more versatile and a more versatile person would normally beat a more one-dimensional fighter, BUT if that one dimensional fighter is very good at what he does, then it doesn't matter.
Like Mike Tyson. He's pretty one dimensional, but trhe one dimension he has is very good.

Also sometimes it can hurt you to be too versatile, then you can't concentrate on what you're best at.

But in general, yes it's better to be versatile, then if your gameplan isn't working, you can switch it up and still win in different scenarios

 

*****s and *******s give their opinion and stick to them. I respect them. You call *****s out with your own made up logical lies you ***** and you never give your opinion which us why NOBODY respects you at all

Pussigh:rofl

 

At the end of the day it's a question of who will walk the walk.

 

You respect *****s and *******s....what a ****in loser you are. That just says you are one of them. atsch