The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. evilsherwin

    evilsherwin Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,852
    0
    Nov 21, 2009
    Hence my post on Pac having a better round/win percentage compared to mayweathers last fights and common opponents between the 2.

    you just proved pac is more versatile with your last line :lol:
     
  2. Ripper11

    Ripper11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    2
    Apr 21, 2011
    :patsch then explain to me how Pac changed his gameplan up then.
    And if he won more rounds, couldn't that mean his original gameplan was working and he didn't have to change it in the fight.
    His gameplan vs Clottey was to overwhelm him with punches and attack his body. He kept the same gameplan the whole fight, but also kept eating right hand leads the whole fight.

    Also answer my question.
    Andre Ward or Manny Pacquiao?
     
  3. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
    Manny Pacquiao

    and BTW officially Pac didn't lose a single round on all 3 scorecards against Clottey. Not one. And like you said he had a completely different gameplan than for example his fight against Cotto, where he only lost one round on all 3 scorecards. And even that was a different gameplan than Hatton, where he didn't lose a single round and won by KO2.

    You don't see versatility in that?
     
  4. Blizz42

    Blizz42 Boxing Addict banned

    4,504
    0
    Jun 1, 2011
    What a ****in loser you are:lol: a hubba hubba, a hubba hubba:lol:. They have opinions *****, you don't! :rofl
     
  5. Bravado

    Bravado Active Member Full Member

    845
    0
    Jan 21, 2011


    Pac did nothing to Mosely. He has one style which is just go.
     
  6. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
    If you think that's his only style just rewatch the Oscar and Hatton fights.

    EVen the Margo fight he fought completely differently than the Mosley fight. Those are back to back fights where he fought totally different styles and yet he didn't lose a single round on all 3 cards.

    I think your vision of boxing is very limited.
     
  7. Blizz42

    Blizz42 Boxing Addict banned

    4,504
    0
    Jun 1, 2011
    I don't really respect you as a poster but I'll ask anyway. Where was the versatility in the Marquez fights and the Morales l fight?
     
  8. Ripper11

    Ripper11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    2
    Apr 21, 2011
    i disagree with Manny being more versatile than Ward, but I do want to thank you for at least making a valid arguement. You are one of the few Pacquiao fans who at least try to talk about what is going on inside the ring.
    But you do make a good point that his gameplan was different in those fights. You could say he only had one gameplan in each fight, but in the 3 fights, each one was different :good

    Also I gave Cotto round 10 and round 1 of the fight
     
  9. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Look, I know you need SOMEONE to follow...but try and look for your boyfriend Vic. And maybe trying to act your age, or at least SOUND like an adult? Thanks.
     
  10. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    :roll: What an insufferable **** you are. You respect *******s and *****s because they give their opinion, but not Philla who usually posts his reasons why he came to a conclusion, and yet you STILL ask him about his opinion. And you don't see ANYTHING wrong I am sure. :patschTime to add an inconsitent, hypocritical troll like you to the ignore list.
     
  11. Blizz42

    Blizz42 Boxing Addict banned

    4,504
    0
    Jun 1, 2011
    Keep your promise, but I know you won't :lol: I ****ing make posters like you sick of me:rofl
     
  12. Blizz42

    Blizz42 Boxing Addict banned

    4,504
    0
    Jun 1, 2011
    Many posters **** on you. Vic sharted on you:rofl. I just happened to witness that ****. Keep your promise. I should only see your posts in quotes:lol:
     
  13. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
    you can definitely make a case for round 10 to Cotto since it was close but the bottom line is that in his last 7 fights which were scheduled for 84 rounds total Pac has only lost 1 round clear enough for all 3 judges to give it to his opponent.

    That's 1 out of 84.

    And he's fought very different styles from Diaz to Oscar to Hatton to Cotto to Clottey to Margo to Mosley. A huge variety of styles and gameplans.

    I would not say Pacquiao is more adaptable than Mayweather but rather more versatile. There is a difference.

    But that's not to say that Pac is not adaptable cause if for example you watch round 1 of the Cotto fight then compare that to rounds 2-6 and then compare that to rounds 7-12 you will see he fought very differently as the fight progressed based on what Cotto was presenting him.
     
  14. Blizz42

    Blizz42 Boxing Addict banned

    4,504
    0
    Jun 1, 2011
    Again, what about the Marquez fights and the Morales l fight. Where was the versatility:huh
     
  15. evilsherwin

    evilsherwin Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,852
    0
    Nov 21, 2009
    You dont have to change your game plan when you are already beating your opponent with your original game plan. To be able to implement a gameplan and stick to it shows better versatility

    He kept eating right hand leads because hes in a boxing match, you get hit just like how fmj got hit and buckled against mosely, even though he is apparantly the best defender in the game..

    I can see why you picked the clottey match to prove your point though lol

    Manny pac is more versatile than Andre ward, like I said when he fights the same calibre opponents as pac and wins handsomely and I'll re think my response

    Has Andre ward in your eyes fought better calibre fighters than pac?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.