jeff fenech vs pernell whitaker

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by buster007, Dec 26, 2009.

  1. darkhorse

    darkhorse Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,046
    Likes Received:
    1
    ..I think the intangibles in a Whitaker/Fenech matchup were Fenech's workrate and ability to cut the ring off...as well as he'd be showin' Whitaker no respect and be in there roughin' him up...the ultimate clash of styles really..
     
  2. buster007

    buster007 FAB 4 R A GAY PORN CLUB Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Messages:
    13,177
    Likes Received:
    431
    or azumah ran into a different fenech.
     
  3. buster007

    buster007 FAB 4 R A GAY PORN CLUB Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Messages:
    13,177
    Likes Received:
    431
    i like it!

    and some people don't think u r great entertainment.
     
  4. darkhorse

    darkhorse Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,046
    Likes Received:
    1
    ..well the Professor was renouned for winnin' his rematches...
     
  5. Dr Gonzo

    Dr Gonzo Yo! Molesta La Breastas! Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Messages:
    11,907
    Likes Received:
    6
    i missed this thread, glad i did

    not only is Sweet Pea far too big for a guy who fought at 130 and below, he is 5 levels above Fenech. Fenech would get peppered with left hands, hooks on the inside and not land a glove on Pernell. It would be embarassing
     
  6. roscoe

    roscoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2006
    Messages:
    4,861
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thats the thing I don't get Buster. Fenech was well prepared for the rematch with Nelson on home soil, fit as a fiddle coming into that fight and was definately up for it mentally during the build up. I think he just got caught early & never recovered. Thats the only difference I saw in him.
     
  7. zoley

    zoley Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2011
    Messages:
    1,104
    Likes Received:
    123
    :good

    Fenech never did anything different in the second fight than he did in the first. Up until the ko there was virtually nothing it. The difference in the second fight was Nelson. People use this ''Jeff was heart broken after the first fight'' That's bull****, Fenech's two biggest assets were his fitness and his mental toughness both of which he still displayed in the second fight. He just ran into the real Azumah.
     
  8. buster007

    buster007 FAB 4 R A GAY PORN CLUB Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Messages:
    13,177
    Likes Received:
    431
    u have no idea about fenechs mental state so don't comment like u know for sure.

    lets remember how bad his hands were, maybe he wasn't able to load up as much as he did in the first fight.

    that's not azumahs fault, no.

    but i think u people underestimate how rip-off decision in fight 1 affected jeff. again not azumahs fault.
    u think what jeff went through to the point of fight 1 up to the end of round 12. all the years of pain, only to get ripped off like that.
     
  9. darkhorse

    darkhorse Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,046
    Likes Received:
    1
    Whitaker was one of the best ever at his style of fighting...and Fenech was one of the best ever at his style of fighting...that clash would've been epic..:deal
     
  10. StiffJab

    StiffJab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    10,289
    Likes Received:
    365
    :thumbsup:thumbsupHELL YEAH:thumbsup:thumbsup
     
  11. The Spider

    The Spider Guest

    Jeff Fenech never gave anyone an easy fight. Pernell Whitaker would likely have outclassed him but he would have got bruised along the way.
     
  12. buster007

    buster007 FAB 4 R A GAY PORN CLUB Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Messages:
    13,177
    Likes Received:
    431
    jeff might still make this happen. he got rid of the ring rust last fight.
     
  13. TCboxa

    TCboxa Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    20,695
    Likes Received:
    2
    it wasnt the same fenech full stop. And yes buster i know i have many fans lol
     
  14. riggers

    riggers Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2008
    Messages:
    2,218
    Likes Received:
    3
    Anyone who thinks Fenech had a hope in hell against Pete is dreaming. Fenech was a fantastic pressure fighter. Pete was one of the top 3 ish defensive geniuses of all time. Now think about it. He utterly neutralized Chavez, who was better than Fenech. He survived the course when past his best against a peak Trinidad, so you think Fenech can stop him ? He ran a prime De La Hoya to the wire , again when past his best. He beat Nelson. He beat Ramirez. He beat McGirt. Fenech had no advantages over Pete. Not even chin, because no way in hell he goes 2 with Trinidad let alone 12. He held off 154lbers so he will hold off Fenech. This is not putting Jeff down. But its a bit like saying Lamotta beats Ali becsuse he had a good chin and closed the ring down well. Fenech is too small, slow, hittable, light punching etc etc to beat Whittaker .
     
  15. darkhorse

    darkhorse Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,046
    Likes Received:
    1
    yep that's your opinion and I'll respect that but I'm sure your opinion was formed with plenty of hindsight...but lets remember back to the day the fight was actually bein' touted...it was 'THE FIGHT'...maybe not as big as a Mayweather/Pacquiao but still a fight of similar proportions...now I'm not gunna disagree with anything you've said about Whitaker..that's true...but Fenech had that little something...he wanted it...he was a fighter and he forced fighters to fight his fight...I don't think the result was a foregone conclusion...JMO :good