Amir Khan - potential to be the greatest British boxer of all time?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by ThereIsOnlyOne, Aug 5, 2011.


  1. Darni187

    Darni187 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,566
    832
    Nov 13, 2008
    :pop

    Me got a pop belly after fasting right now, great reading, keep it coming..
     
  2. sud2002

    sud2002 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,059
    0
    Feb 11, 2011
    Bradley, nope he doesn't beat Khan.
     
  3. jpab19

    jpab19 Exploding Muffin Dad Full Member

    15,720
    5
    Jul 8, 2010
    The point is that he has a better chance than Maidana did.
     
  4. Moe Greene

    Moe Greene Guest

    Yep, and Wilde still looked damn good before falling to an even more quality looking Villa in an ABSOLUTE WAR!
     
  5. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    4
    Nov 28, 2007
    I don't really see what the discussion point is, the only way you can achieve this is to beat great fighters.

    These guys, Malignaggi, Kotelnik, Maidana, Judah are very very average in the grand scheme of things when we're talking about greatness. They're just B and C level fighters in their era. He actually has to beat somebody like Pacquiao or Mayweather for this to even be worth discussing, OR move up to welterweight and junior middle and beat a host of contenders.
     
  6. Moe Greene

    Moe Greene Guest

    Unfortunately for him, he jut won't fight regularly enough in an era with enough depth to make him an true ATG. That is saying he keeps on winning/wins spectacularly enough in the future to make up for any more losses he may suffer along the way. I just don't think this kid is built for longevity either.

    Which trumps 'advanced conditioning methods' every time.
     
  7. sud2002

    sud2002 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,059
    0
    Feb 11, 2011
    My point was nobody (bar the super 2) can beat Khan to a decision.
     
  8. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    4
    Nov 28, 2007
    I think he's got the time to do it at 24 years of age, he isn't taking too many meaningless fights, they're mostly of a good standard that enhances his record each time.

    But the only way to actually acheive it is to beat a great fighter, so the question is more like does he have the potential to do that?

    Or I suppose he could do it on sheer weight of numbers which to a large extent Lennox did, to do that he'd have to move through the weights convincingly.
     
  9. Moe Greene

    Moe Greene Guest

    Lennox luckily fought in a great Heavyweight era. And had far more attributes/ability than Khan.

    As you know. I actually wonder why you're being so optimistic :lol:
     
  10. JFT96

    JFT96 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,636
    1
    Apr 27, 2010
    you're over-estimating Khan here. Bradley/Khan would be a genuine 50-50 fight imo if it were to take place, Khan may have the speed advantage but I struggle to see how he will be able to keep Bradley from pushing him back- he doesn't have the sufficient power or an authoritative enough jab. To his credit, Khan manoueveres himself decently off the ropes but the Maidana fight showed that this expends a lot of energy and that it eventually catches up with him.

    I would probably lean towards Khan if they fought but as I say, I find it hard to give a really solid case to favour one man over the either. And certainly not one conclusive enough to give Bradley no chance whatsoever.
     
  11. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    4
    Nov 28, 2007
    I'm not being optimistic, I'm just saying what he'd have to do to achieve it.

    I do think most of Lennox's standing is based on weight of numbers. I mean he fought a guy impersonating Mike Tyson. He did beat Holyfield I suppose. The rest of them, you can't really say there are too many greats in there. What I'm saying is in theory its possible to do something similar at 147lbs and moving up to 154lbs.
     
  12. Moe Greene

    Moe Greene Guest

    Fair enough. I know what you're saying, that Lennox didn't really have 1 defining win. But he faced a, ahem, smorgasbord of top contenders, and did at least have wins over two guaranteed ATGs, admittedly towards the end of their careers. But I think he beat enough prime contenders, and never ducked anyone (unless you count Chris Byrd, Bowe ducking him, or a rematch with Vitali)

    I can't see Khan amassing even that kind of resume to be honest. But it will be a fun ride:thumbsup
     
  13. 53 and counting

    53 and counting Warriors. Full Member

    3,214
    0
    Sep 13, 2010
    So you ask the bloke to name you an inside fighter who can beat Khan and he names one (which is a valid opinion in alot of peoples eyes and the division number 1, although not in my eyes, but still a valid answer) and you just say nope and this is your only point of argument, discounting all other points of his argument because you obviously dont have any answer to come back on in this debate. Am i following this right? If so then you have more holes in your defence than Tommy Sheridan.
     
  14. Darni187

    Darni187 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,566
    832
    Nov 13, 2008
    Thing is around Khan's weight most of the big names of the past 15years are nearing to the end of their career's fighters like Mosley, JMM, Cotto, Maragrito, Floyd, Pacman.

    Khan soon will not be left with too many super fights which can give him some greatness to his record.

    Plans are in motion to face Floyd next year sometime, but many still find that too early for the still only 25yrs old next year Khan.

    Next year Khan also will be moving upto 147 where the big cats lay, let's see what pans out.
     
  15. WalletInspector

    WalletInspector Obsessed with Boxing banned

    21,194
    2
    Jan 1, 2010
    This content is protected