Naseem Hamed breaks Marco Antonio Barreras nose then does the Ali Shuffle

At least nobody on the Classic Forum would be silly enought to claim that Hamed would have beaten Arguello.You should go on the Classic and make your "points" as those posters would be laughing at you as hard as I am right now.I'm fifty and I've seen enough of those ATGs on video to know they would have easily beaten the technically deficient Hamed.Nelson would have beaten Hamed's ass all over the ring.There is not one shred of evidence or performance or any of Hamed's victims that would have indicated he would have beaten Nelson,unless of course,you're going to bring up Hardy again

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5m5dk-Agck[/ame]

don't have to be 80 to see these legends


and wheres my link to proof that morales was offered this money

 

Morales scared to death of Hamed?Proof please.And btw,Augie Sanchez was stretchered out of the ring 3 times in his career.Once before Hamed,once against Hamed,and once after Hamed.He's only lost 3 times in his career but can't get a license to box in the US due to the brutal ko's he's suffered.I love it when Hamed supporters use Sanchez as an example of Hamed's so-called "great" resume.But then again,you're using Hamed's performances over Bungu and Robinson as some kind of proof of why Hamed would have beaten Arguello.You're hilarious!!Thank you for posting again!!Technically deficient Hamed would have outboxed Arguello?And you're using the examples of Hamed's "TECHNICAL MASTERPIECES" over BUNGU and ROBINSON?Thank you.Thank you so much.BTW,you still haven't answered my previous question on just HOW Hamed would have beaten Arguello.

 

:goodThanks BTB.Great quality in that video.Great stuff:good

 

this thread is hilarious as a nuthugging parody. i was a big fan of hammed because of his power, showmanship and unorthodox style, but i was like many others who always said that he would be soundly beaten the first time he met a master boxer. i was not surprised when mab whipped his ass although i didnt think mab would be the one to do it so convincingly.
i thought about addressing the naz would beat arguello comment but i would feel like a grown man trying to debate politics with a 12 yo.

 

welcome

now just waiting for the links

 

I know what you're saying,Bandeedo.The possibility is strong that this whole thread is just one big windup due to its insanity.

 

Lol,Ceferino Garcia was the MIDDLEWEIGHT Champion.Hamed turned down a catchweight offer to fight Floyd Mayweather at 128,saying,"How many times do you want to move up?"Armstrong would have knocked Hamed out,probably quite easily.Blacktopbully asked for a link of Morales turning down a career high payday against Hamed,and you produced a newspaper clipping of Morales turning down Khan at this point in time,lol.But what easily is the funniest part of your recent threads is bringing in Hamed's victory over Augie Sanchez as if it were so impressive to rate Hamed as highly as you do.You are truly ****ing hilarious.Bandeedo is 100% correct,hahaha!I get it.You're just trying to give us a good belly laugh.Thank you again,hent,hahaha.

 

Are you still trying to say that Hamed would outbox Arguello? You are reaching a little too far in your efforts to inflate Hamed's legacy. I suspect you have tied your ego to this because you are of Arabic heritage, no? I see no other reason for this foolishness; this goes beyond nationalistic pride of an Englishman. Maybe you're trolling? If you really believe this, your ego has allowed you to become delusional. Seek help.

I'll tell you how Arguello beats Hamed: he beats his ass from pillar to post.

 

Some people don't half make Hamed look bad :---(

 

uh that says he turns down 1.5 million to fight khan

 

I'm not referring to youtube clips.I've seen enough of Hamed,his opponents and MAB throughout their careers to know that none of Hamed's victims were special featherweights when he fought them.Pretty good,yeah,but nothing special.And btw,there are plenty of people on these boards that claim that Hamed WAS an atg featherweight.If you're a regular on these boards-as I've no idea myself-you'd know that.And you wrote yourself,"Naz had a long list of pretty decent opponents which included many an ex-champion."That's EXACTLY my ****ing point.I've written almost the exact same quote many times,including even,on this thread.And just for the record,Hamed deserves the stick that he gets from his many detractors as he was a classless **** when he was on the go.P.S.you did not originally attack me,so I apologize for calling you an ******* in the 1st place.