how i view the JMM vs. Pac Trilogy

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Koman600, Aug 10, 2011.


  1. Koman600

    Koman600 Guest

    First Fight- PAC SHOULD OF WON

    Second Fight- JMM SHOULD OF WON

    third fight- doesn't prove anything, PAC SHOULD WIN
     
  2. Hitman-Fan

    Hitman-Fan Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,431
    1
    May 27, 2009

    First Fight (Both at their best) JMM WON

    Second fight (Both at their best) JMM WON

    Third fight (Pac at his best, JMM fighing at a weight not suited to him and not the same fighter he once was) PAC DESTROYS JMM

    All *******s say that the 3rd fight proves Pac was better

    That's b******t
     
  3. dhenzrae

    dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

    7,856
    0
    Mar 8, 2008
    i understand why you hate him :yep
     
  4. shelterr

    shelterr Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,886
    0
    Sep 7, 2006
    I've never been able to give Pac more than 4 rounds of the first fight. That comes to 113-112 JMM at best. The second fight I also scored for JMM but by a narrow margin. It's a very close fight and I don't blame anyone for scoring it for either guy by a point. It really depends on your mood when you watch it. A one round victory to either guy or a Draw is fair.

    As far as the third fight is concerned... Pac should steamroll JMM in the later rounds, but it will be interesting to see how much Pac has really improved since the 2nd fight. There is a chance that JMM still has his number and wlll always give Pac a run for his money. Pac better hope it isn't too competitive...for obvious reasons...
     
  5. Suga

    Suga Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,731
    1
    May 2, 2010
    I agree. But I still think JMM got a good chance in the third fight.
     
  6. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    I think if it were 2 draws it would have actually been fair to both fighters since the fights were so close 2 times basically neither guy deserved to lose.