How can people act like it was a clear fight? the fight was extremely close, it all depends who you give rounds 1,7,11 all the other rounds are clear, a draw probably woul have been the most fair outcome.
I think Mayweather's been ducking Pacquiao and think Pacqiuiao will win the rematch but expect a load of jolly come lately Pacquiao fans to troll this and say it's bs. Marquez was a clear winner in this one.
again how was it clear you basically have 4 rounds pac clearly won and 5 marquez clearly won with 3 rounds that can go either way + the knockdown. How can it be clear then?
You don't havetoo much objectivity with a Pacquaio avi and being 1 of his biggest fans I wonder how many neutral fans scored this fight to Pac?
Why not? I never said marquez couldnt have gotten the decision, if marquez had won that fight 114-113 style I wouldnt have complained about it since it was so close, a close score either way or a draw is fair, but its not a robbery similair to fights such as martinez vs williams 1 or oscar vs whitaker.
I'm a Pac fan and I scored it to JMM by one point. I thought he won, but to call it a robbery, is over the top. Close fights like that can never be robberies.
It was a close fight. JMM won it imo but it was close enough to have gone the other way without it being considered a robbery.
I'm a ******* and I have JMM winning by a point despite a knockdown. But to call it a robbery is a ****ing disgrace. Judges scored it "real time" and they don't have the luxury of re-watching the rounds. WTF PAC haters :huh
LOL, why bump my thread, there were 1,000 like these when it happened.:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl Anyway, it wasnt a robbery. It was GRAND THEFT DECISION!!!!:yep:good