Is the heavyweight division actually weaker today than in the past? Or is it just a myth? For fifty years (30's to the late 80s) America controled the division, making up mostly 50% of the top ten heavyweights in the rankings at any given time. The other half, made up of various fighters from around the world (minus Eastern Europe and Cuba). Now, let's look at the rankings today minus EasternEurope and Cuba. #1 Eddie Chambers..USA. #2 Tony Thompson..USA. #3 David Haye........UK... #4 Chris Arreola......USA. #5 Marurice Harris...USA. #6 Jonathon Banks..USA #7 Jean M Mormeck..FRA. #8 Cedric Boswell....USA. #9 David Tua..........NZ. #10 Tyson Fury......UK. As you can see, if not for fighters from the east, Americans would still be "Top Dog" in the Division. The only thing that has changed is now boxing is far more international.:hi:
What has changed in America is there are many potential boxers sitting in jails all across the country. What has changed in America? The USA, the land of the free, has more people sitting in jail on bogus charges than Russia, China, Cuba, England, and Europe combined. In the case of African Americans, they are political prisoners.
Are you saying that the justice system in the US is worse than that of England, Russia, China and Cuba?:huh
no it isn't necessarily that much weaker. it just followed a golden age of the 90's is all. it stacks up well against era's ruled by holmes, johnson, dempsey etc
i get the african american part, but there are about 260 million other people in the US. AAs arent the only ones who can fight
:smoke Bull**** . There were to wars in the last century which wiped out a couple of gererations in EUROPE . What do you say about that .