Pacquiao doesnt deserve to be ranked nr1 P4P

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PowerHoock, Aug 11, 2011.


  1. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004

    No, for the simple reason, you post like a stupid kid. You made no valid points, not even an attempt. You're just a **** talking punk who think they know more then they will ever produce. But you will be loud and annoying I'm sure. And other idiots will agree with you, making you think you are smart. You aren't... :roll:
     
  2. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    This is too stupid to go 10 pages...

    BTW, where's your outrage over what the stupid Floyd fanboys say, unless you agree with him.:hey

    Isn't that what you say to me all the time?:rofl

    Just messing with you...
     
  3. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    Who in your opinion is p4p #1 then?
     
  4. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    "Pacquiao's a cherry picker"

    Who did he duck?

    "Uhh..."


    "Pacquiao shouldn't be P4P #1"

    Who should be P4P #1 instead?

    "Uhh....."
     
  5. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
  6. Bazooka

    Bazooka Pimp C Wants 2 Be Me Full Member

    44,390
    6
    Oct 23, 2005

    When your opinion regarding P4P rankings acutally matter I am sure Ring will notify you with an offer of employement until then go back to living in your moms basement.
     
  7. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    Another *** to add to the ignore...
     
  8. PowerHoock

    PowerHoock Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,084
    3
    Jan 18, 2011
  9. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    Who doesn't even know how to spell HOOK.... :patsch
     
  10. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    its pretty true, he hasnt fought anyone in their prime since jmm. hatton already lost to floyd. cotto lost to margarito
     
  11. PowerHoock

    PowerHoock Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,084
    3
    Jan 18, 2011
    at least he doesnt fight fighters, who's confidence has been brutalised by a vicious beating recently
     
  12. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    that doesnt make them shot though, thats like saying if anyone beats pac know it isnt impressive cause it has been done 3 times already.
     
  13. PowerHoock

    PowerHoock Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,084
    3
    Jan 18, 2011
    not really... pacs losses are ancient... Shanes loss isnt, neither was Haton or ODHs...

    best fighter in the world? pfff... if he's the best, why doesnt he fight the best fighters around his weight, like a Sergio??
     
  14. Bravado

    Bravado Active Member Full Member

    845
    0
    Jan 21, 2011
    Pacman is necessary for boxing man. In as much as you may think he is a cheater, or he is doped up whatever he is giving this sport a lot of press and making boxing stay "relevant" to the minds of casual fans who just want to see instant action gratification. Nothing wrong with him boxing. Its good for him to be around and above all, he is good for the sport
     
  15. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    This content is protected