Boxing Should Integrate Officials To Officiate The Officials.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by David Fanning, Aug 14, 2011.


  1. David Fanning

    David Fanning Internet Tuff Guy Full Member

    9,562
    2
    Aug 22, 2009
    Most sports have a team of officials to officiate the games, matches, etc. I believe that this makes it a little less likely for one person to **** it all up and completely deflate its integrity. These other sports have also expanded their abilities to overturn bad decisions. In Boxing, just one man has the power to damn near ruin a boxer's life, or in the very least, his livelihood, all the while slapping boxing fans in the face.

    Boxing has three judges. Though they do sometimes manage to screw fights up in tandem, it's still better than one. Would the same not be true for referees in Boxing?
     
  2. David Fanning

    David Fanning Internet Tuff Guy Full Member

    9,562
    2
    Aug 22, 2009
    Not everybody at once now. One at a time please.
     
  3. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    45,579
    13,493
    Mar 5, 2006
    an association of referees?

    nobody wants to police their own..

    Mora should be investigated and disciplined accordingly by the NSAC.

    I think that's the last we'll ever see him on TV and that's a good thing.
     
  4. jeffjoiner

    jeffjoiner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,183
    5
    Jun 22, 2008
    If they are not going to use replay, then an extra or two of eyes would be a good thing. They could position assistant referees on opposing sides of the ring. The head ref could consult with them on critical calls then make the ultimate decision.

    For example: In the 11th round last night, Mora could have looked over and quickly asked an assistant if the blow was low. If the knockdown is legit, the ref could easily pick up the timekeeper's count by the count of 4.

    In cases of a cut, the ref could consult with the assistants after the round and render his final decision of punch or cut to the officials at that time.
     
  5. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,104
    Jul 24, 2004
    Boxing does have officials to officiate officials.

    These higher officials dictate to the refs and judges which fighters should get preferential treatment and benefit of the doubt.

    You guys did'nt really think most of these judges and refs were really inept did you???:lol:
     
  6. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,104
    Jul 24, 2004
    Keep dreaming, boxing's higher ups would never let the video tape screw with the decisions they've predetirmened should be.
     
  7. David Fanning

    David Fanning Internet Tuff Guy Full Member

    9,562
    2
    Aug 22, 2009
    Last night certainly wasn't ineptitude. It was blatantly corrupt.

    I am referring to more of a second or third referee as opposed to an overseer who appoints refs and judges....somebody involved in the live action. Somebody near the ring to consult with or overturn knockdowns that were originally disregarded, blatant shots to the balls, for example
     
  8. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,104
    Jul 24, 2004

    If boxing did that, they would have less leeway for their very own corruption capabilites and instruction.

    As it is now, boxing just sweeps it under the rug and chalks it up to "matter of opinion" or "human error."

    .....but if we had officials at ringside judging what to rule on lowblows and the like, you're taking away a big part of their necessity and ability to be able to be corrupt.

    In other words, the less people involved in a criminal act, the better your chances increase to get away with it.

    You dont want to have 5 or 6 officials questioned on a percieved unjust act when you can have it be less. The less officials involved the better their chances to keep their stories in line with eachother.
     
  9. David Fanning

    David Fanning Internet Tuff Guy Full Member

    9,562
    2
    Aug 22, 2009
    I wish you were wrong, but you're not. Damn you for pissing on my parade with reality.

    As a fan, you pretty much just have to accept corruption in boxing. Yet, we all act so surprised every time something like this happens. Just one more reason records in boxing mean jack ****.
     
  10. DemolitionDan

    DemolitionDan ATG and HoF Full Member

    17,643
    10
    Jun 29, 2009
    In a perfect world this is what would happen, but what divac is spot on. Boxing always has and always will be corrupt, the only way it changes is if all of us, the fans, just make a protest and stopping watching and giving money to these corrupt promoters, and officials. Unfortunately, the fighters are the ones that would have to suffer. The only other alternative is having one big governing body oversee everything, which I doubt will ever happen.
     
  11. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Dirrell's brother won a fight by extreme low blow and the commentators thought it was fine. Vic was hit will low blows all night and the commentators thought is was fine, then the other robberies....................
     
  12. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,104
    Jul 24, 2004
    I've been a fan for 30 years and I've seen too much to know that boxing will always be corrupt.

    A big part of the problem is that there are not enough media journalist that really know the intracacies of the sport of boxing.
    There are too many journalist today hired to write and comment on the sport that just dont know the sport, because of this the sport is'nt kept in check.


    At one point during the 80's, HBO boxing broadcasts were highlly critical of the corruption in the sport.
    A broadcast team like HBO critiqueing bad decisions and critiqueing a alphabet group from granting an undeserved fighter a title shot, is good for boxing because it at least keeps the higher ups that control the sport leary of whats being said to the fans about them, and at least keeps them a little bit in check.

    .....however, because boxing is such a big business, HBO throughout the years having a financial interest in certain fighters that they broadcast, have become just as corrupt as the alphabet groups themselves.
    Nowdays, the HBO broadcast team if it suits their financial interest will create controversy within a fight broadcast when there is'nt one, and vice versa they'll keep their mouth shut and remain silent on a fishy situation if the benificiary of the situation is the fighter thats keeping their ratings up.

    I can go on and on naming variables that keep the sport in its corrupt state, but there are just too many to list.

    I've learned to just enjoy the fights and the fighters and enjoy the act of the fighters putting their craft in exhibit.
    .....of course I still frown at the bad decisions, but I just dont let it control the enjoyment I feel for the sport itself.:bbb
     
  13. KOTF

    KOTF Bingooo Full Member

    13,448
    26
    Jun 2, 2009
    I can't imagine multiple referees in the ring at the same time; bout the only thing that would work is instant replay but even then I also can't imagine the referee going "under the hood" to watch a replay of an illegal shot