IF removing the obvious size difference who is/was more talented and who would won assuming if they were the same size (say 135 lb)?
Hamed - Faster overall, more power, solid chin, better reflexes and better foot movement Khan - Faster hand speed, great jab, very good stamina, good height/reach, better coach and better dedication Hamed was clearly the more talented of boxers, it's just a big shame he quit after his loss aginst Barerra. I guess when a boxer loses his hunger for the sport then it's better to quit.
Khan seems to be the better rounded fighter because hes more orthodox, has freddie roach and is more disciplined as a fighter. I still feel though that Hamed was the brighter spark. A real shame he left the sport so prematurely
dumb thread Hamed tkos Khan 100 out of 100 times Hamed not only outboxes and tko's you but he humiliates you as well.
Sorry Barerra Although some people may get their panties in a twist but i think Nas was as gifted as Pacquaio was. The difference being Pac was more hungry and dedicated to the sport than Nas. I wonder what would have happened to Nas if he went to Freddie Roach?
This thread is like comparing Wladimir and Haye. Some times being flashy does not work and solid boxing skill and speed does.
why are people saying he would knock out khan its like saying arthur abraham would knock out wlad because wlad has a weak chin.