The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Im merely pointing it out :deal

 

Nope, because briggs was never considered the top hw in the world.

Because tyson was considered the best and then holy was after beating him and then lewis was after beating him.

 

Who is the better fighter currently: lara or williams?

 

Nope.

 

Doesn't matter who the top rated HW is.

Briggs beat the Man. Tyson didn't.

1 + 1 = 2

Simple arithmetic.

 

Doesn't matter with regard to who got the W.

 

so you still consider pac's cotto win "not a legit WW win" now? do you still consider ortiz' berto win a legit WW win after knowing it was fought also at catchweight?

 

atsch I can see you are going to stick with this bull**** regardless of what anyone says to you. Only you idiots think there is something legitimate about calling someone "the man" in boxing. Yeah, Ric Flair really beat that line into your head didn't he? :roll:

 

Tyson was the man, what's so hard to understand.

Synergy.

 

Because in reality lara got the win and everyone watching knows it.

Just as floyd clearly beat oscar even though officially he lost on one of the cards.

 

You have to BEAT the Man in order to BE the Man. Post prison Tyson didn't.

 

The official results have it as a W for Williams....

 

The fact is the Cotto victory is tarnished by the catchweight stipulation. It's also a fact that the fight was not contested @ the welterweight limit.

These are the facts.

 

so how about the ortiz-berto fight, was it a legit WW win for ortiz?

 

I was spot on about Flair and you! atsch