Klitschko haters love to run to Boxrec when they think it supports their point, but belittle it as "misleading" if it doesnt. Well seeing as how you check Jaco record out on Boxrec you also seen that after he stopped Ruddock Jaco went 5-21-1 in his next fights. But I Guess thats because Ruddock "Ruined" Jaco. Right?
Ruddock was severly one dimensional. Sure he hit hard, but he never beat prime anybody and just loaded up a couple times every round trying to land his trademark " smash". His conditioning was lousy.
I agree. Ruddock was a one trick pony he really only had his Smash and that was it. He really wasn't even competitive against Tyson he basically just took a beating in both fights and got Kudos for not being blown away like most of Tyson's opponents.
Never said a word about boxrec, but, since we're on the subject, it's the context and the way the stats are presented. It is obvious from your posts that is the only source of info you are using and you're misleading in the stats that you choose to present. You obviously didn't watch the Tyson/Ruddock fights or don't have a clue if you did. You really should, they were great fights, pay particular attention to the counterpunching, granite chins and iron will displayed by both fighters...Those attributes stand in stark contrast to those of your boy... And yes, Puritty was something like 6-7-2 after ko'ing your 24-0 boy...