For all the people that say a Prime Muhammad Ali would beat either of the Klitschkos

Get a ****ing clue! Seriously, you people are beyond stupid with this **** and I'm tired of hearing all your lame reasons why Ali would beat them. Despite his height, Ali was a small heavyweight, and would look like a dwarf in the ring with either brother. Also, people like to say that Ali would beat Vitali because he beat George Foreman What kind of dumb **** comparison in that! Vitali was bigger then Foreman and certainly had more skills. The only reason people don't say Foreman was overated is due to the fact he landed one lucky punch in a fight he was getting dominated in asa old man. No one would hold that man in such regard if he lost that fight. Foreman was overrated, and he is also one of the slowest Heavyweight Champions of all-time. Even right now at 40 yo Vitali Klitschko has more speed then a prime Foreman.

Muhammad Ali gets overrated in the eyes of boxing fans because of the caltual presense he was in the late 60's early 70's. His biggest wins are against fighters that would stand no chance with either Klitschko Brother. Example one. Joe Frazier: Do you see any scenario where a 5'9 guy like that can though eaither brother? And Ali lost to him! A guy that fought with one eye most of his career. Ken Norton: The guy should have 3 wins over Ali. All the fights that happened between the two, Norton had the edge. The third fight was a terrible robbery! Could you see either of the Klitschko's losing to a guy that got knocked out by Gerry Cooney in one round LOL Leon Spinks: May I need to say more :rofl

The only fighter that Ali fought that could give eaither of the Klitschkos any trouble at all was Larry Holmes. You got to respect this man's jab, which I honestly believe is better then Wladimir's. I think there was a point that Holmes could of beat Wlad, and made it a very close fight, but I would not see him beating Vitali. Vitali throws from odd angles and would give Holmes a lot of trouble. So I'd see the fight going the distance with Vitali taking a decision in a competitive match.

Anyways, I just had get that off my chest cause I think people that have very little knowledge on the sport keep knocking the Klitschko's when if you look at history, and the great fighters of past, it is very hard to find Heavyweights that would top either of them right now. Muhammad Ali was a great fighter, but he was no where are great as people make him out to be, and I think people need to be more realistic when evaluating how great he was.

 

Wow, you are clearly a moron. Vitali got outboxed by Chris Byrd???? Are you stupid! He was dominating Byrd and he got a debilitating injury!!! Look at the scorecards for the fight before you open your mouth to me. Wladimir is just caution first fighter, and that is what protects what I will admit is a weaker chin. He is a safty first fighter and he would eaisely outpoint Ali with this style. Are you telling me Wladimir would not do what Ken Norton did 3 times? And you would not even give me a real reason why Vitali would not defeat Ali. You are out of your league in this discussion. Go play with your toys, cause this is adult conversation.

 

I have reported you. This is the general forum and you have no right to bring that stuff here. I will say you are probably a virgin *****, and that is why you are so obsessed with that one small aspect of that situation. Take your **** to the lounge with the rest of the degenerates. This is a boxing conversation. Next time I tap a piece of Hot ass that would could never dream of getting, I'll post in the lounge so you can have something that will make you had your sad pathetic life more. Now crawl back under your rock ***. :hi: