just like was already said earlier..you have to be a complete idiot to not know who won a fight you just watched... keep pretending you are a boxing judge...you would fit right in with all the other ones who are blind and score fights too
it's about getting hit when you're not looking. Identical thing happened with Montell Griffin. Ever heard the expression "it's the one's you don't see"? see Paul Williams, who took about 45 flush bombs from Lara, 45 flush bombs from Martinez in their first fight, and then was lights out on a punch he didn't see coming. come on iceman. Help us out by thinking harder about these matters.
you are just a wannabe,you analyse boxing and came up with "direll can beat up anyone at 168 " ...i'd say go back to watching the fights,you might enjoy it more,beside you suck at analyse
well anyone can beat anyone. i concluded i'd favour andre above any active boxer at 168. wannabe what? I'm a fukin maths teacher. But I really love boxing and when I watch fights I like to analyse them, here is one of my favourite threads: http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=186016 as a spectator sport there is nothing better than boxing because of it's subjective nature. difference between a hardcore fan and a casual fan has been plenty exemplified in this discussion betwene you and I.
Just saw the Dirrell vs Abraham clip... Did Dirrell cry like a girl at the end? PMSL. Damn man. No wonder he is a runner.
I like the way you keep droning on and on about being a self proclaimed hardcore fan and so knowledgeable about boxing yet your vcash is 75. Why with your expert analysis that you sux so much at picking a winner in boxing? I mean it is only like two guys to choose. You watch so many fights and with all your score cards and you have 75 vcash? Whats up with that maths teacher? Did you get your probability wrong? :rofl
Wait so it was ok for Barrera to do it?? If you go by that logic then it was a delayed reaction by Abraham as in the previous round he was denied a legitimate KD. Also who cares about the power. Both were solid shots landed. Dirrell just happened to lack the Mexican gene which would have told him to get up and beat the **** out of this dude. Instead he got the American gene saying get the DQ and if not take him to court and sue everyone for all their worth.
Pretty much EVERY knockout results from "the one you don't see" so that's a weak argument. "Is that the announcer man? Is that the announcer man? ... " Puh-leeez.
I dont talk for him, but I dont think its what he wanted to say. Anyway if true Johnson would not fight a world title at 42 and Dirrell would not be the one with brain problems.
Dirrell is a damn good fighter and possibly the best 168 fighter in the world when healthy. He's a Euro killer so they hate on him, then all the die hards of the other 168 guys hate on him, but regardless what people say I believe he's the wild card of this division and possibly the best...time will tell.
So you've never seen any fight except the Froch fight, yet you are this steadfast in such ludicrous opinions? No disrespect but that's dumb as **** Breh.