Which Title would you say is the most legit/relevant

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by kommieforniaglo, Aug 22, 2011.


  1. kommieforniaglo

    kommieforniaglo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,396
    15
    Jun 10, 2010
    I think we can all concur the WBA is a Joke, but of the other ones I think the WBC is also losing credibility with their "Daimond, Silver, Emeritus" and other bull****..


    Me thinks the only one right now that is somewhat credible and the most legit is the IBF....:deal


    What say you??..
     
  2. Henke67

    Henke67 One of the 45% Full Member

    9,468
    376
    Feb 10, 2009
    The Ring's.

    All the alphabet organisations are as bad as each other, so I can't take any of them seriously.
     
  3. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
  4. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
  5. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    This.
     
  6. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,569
    1,280
    May 31, 2010
    The the ABC's in place, lineal is impossible.:nut
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,680
    21,298
    Sep 15, 2009
    The only real title that matters is number 1. Whoever is the number 1 in the division. For the vast majority the lineage of the ring (at the point it ceased publication all it's champs were lineal, when it restarted it awarded jones instead of dm) champ has been the number 1 but even that has deviations (e.g. Briggs was never, ever, seen as the number 1 in the division)
     
  8. Kampioni

    Kampioni Good Boy Full Member

    5,850
    10
    May 23, 2007
    Ring. But out of the ABC's i'd go with either wbo/ibf
     
  9. antonio8904

    antonio8904 Atheist Full Member

    6,138
    1
    Oct 19, 2008
    Ring is what i go by, out of alphabet belts i used to go by WBC but they are pathetic these days, i'd have to say IBF is head and shoulders above all other alphebet belts these days...
     
  10. Atlanta

    Atlanta Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,688
    6
    Dec 26, 2009
    IBF, but those ****ers keep on stripping people who don't fight their bull**** mandos.
     
  11. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    30
    Feb 16, 2010
    The IBF has a pretty good reputation...comparatively speaking... as they don't seem to play the games that have become so commonplace with the other organizations.
     
  12. pahapoisu

    pahapoisu Superman! Full Member

    7,824
    2
    Jul 5, 2010
    The Ring. Even they have questionable moments such as the P4P Section. After beating Mosley Mayweather was elevated to nr 1 P4P. Manny Pacquiaos victory over Margarito but him at nr 1... :rofl **** like that CRACKS ME UP
     
  13. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    The Linear title is the ONLY title that matters. All others are no more relevant than doorstops or paper weights...
     
  14. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    The Ring magazine's title is a joke...
     
  15. pahapoisu

    pahapoisu Superman! Full Member

    7,824
    2
    Jul 5, 2010
    They have a bad mandatory system but its nothing compared to all the other bs the other titles deliver daily.
    Pavlik talks about moving to 168. Gets elevated to NR 1 by the WBC.
    Alexander talks about moving to 147. Same **** but only nr 2.
    Bradley gets stripped because the WBC "though Bradley was moving up in weight with all the Pacquiao and Maywaether talk..."
    WBA heavyweight belt is vacant even though Wladimir just won it, paid sanctioning fees and didnt vacate it...