how come movers are almost considered techical fighters? while pressure fighters

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by highguard, Dec 20, 2010.


  1. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    I agree the come foward, pressure fighters are all too often labeled as brawlers. However, movers who simply jab and throw occasional straight shots are not referred to as technical. Many of them are refered to as runners, cowards, and boring. Now robotic fighters like Kessler seem to be always refered to as technical fighters. Then again, maybe it's just perception.
     
  2. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    there's a certain group of fans who consider any successful defensively minded fighter as skilled.
     
  3. Leon

    Leon The Artful Dodger Full Member

    40,234
    13
    Mar 14, 2010
    Because they're are successful.
     
  4. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    but those type of fans don't consider all successful fighters as skilled, only the defensively minded ones.
     
  5. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    rios is pretty technically sound

    leaves his hands up, moves his head jabs his way in and throws short combos.
     
  6. Beatle

    Beatle Sheer Analysis Full Member

    9,270
    269
    Apr 12, 2009
    I totally agree with you. Also, when a dancer outpoints a brawler, they say he "schooled" them. But you never hear anyone say that Joe Frazier schooled Ali (which he totally did).

    It's a case of mass persuasion. Ali just kept on talking on TV and repeating that he was the greatest, and eventually everyone was brainwashed.

    Jack Dempsey, Rocky Marciano and Mike Tyson would beat Ali much worse than Frazier did.
     
  7. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,136
    Oct 17, 2009
    Right; he's someone who, though lacking an elite-level defense, still has great experience in creating space on the inside, timing his punches, rolling with shots and slipping some, coming back with short combinations, etc.

    My friend, whose a casual fan, along with many here on ESB, throw around the ideas that him and Antillon were just "beating the hell out of each other" and had "no defense". For ****'s sake, even Margarito leans to the side to slip the occasional punch. Taking some shots does not mean you have no defense. "No defense" just doesn't exist for infighters.
     
  8. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    margarito uses more angles than he gets given credit for he even managed to trouble pacquiao somewhat.
     
  9. highguard

    highguard Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,791
    6
    Apr 12, 2010
    thanks i am happy to see some people agreeing with me

    when i mention this to many people i just get a blank look

    lol

    great points by jmp,beatle and many others
     
  10. KillSomething

    KillSomething Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,126
    57
    Dec 1, 2009
    You pretty much have to be a fighter or a HARDCORE fight fan to appreciate infighting for what it is. It's all skill in there. On the outside you can rely on your athleticism, but on the inside it's just you and what you've learned.
     
  11. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009


    I guess dictating a high tempo with aggression, is percieved to be an easier skill than dictating a slow tempo.

    Fighters like Ricky Hatton & Paul Williams cant keep from getting picked off from range unless they're in your face unloading. Paul Williams got outboxed by Kermit Cintron in spells, and was picked off something chronic by Quintana.

    Maybe inside fighters take more punishment to? I mean when you look at James Toney, Pernell Whitaker, they are two of the most skilled fighters ever at rolling and slipping punches whilst in the pocket, then countering, but both sound a little punchy.

    Being a master of controlling space time and distance is perceived to be a hard skill, which is probably why people put more stock in fighters who use their legs and fight from range.
     
  12. highguard

    highguard Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,791
    6
    Apr 12, 2010
    i agree with killsomething

    and gooners has a point about takeing pushment
    but then again sweet pea fought a ton of great fighters and always went the distance
    so lots of rounds against tough guys can do that too you

    and hey look at ali. he was the ulimate run, jab jab right hand,clinch fighter....
    and he doesnt talk all that well lol

    but i dont think paul williams and hatton should be really discussed here

    cause hatton while sometimes skillful on the inside, often he would clinch and hold and hit
    so thats not too skillful

    and williams is just a guy throwing a million punches
    from any range lol
     
  13. Leon

    Leon The Artful Dodger Full Member

    40,234
    13
    Mar 14, 2010
    Boxing is about hitting as much as you can while getting hit in return as least as possible.

    Taking some punishment is apart of the deal with being a pressure fighter.
     
  14. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,136
    Oct 17, 2009
    Well, Hatton is underrated in that department as well. His style is not pretty by any means, but there's a reason he won convincingly and stayed undefeated for so long. He employs subtle tactics that many on here don't even pick up on, but that are essential to his success in separating him from lesser technicians.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmdzcfwQApU&feature=player_embedded[/ame]
     
  15. Manjanek

    Manjanek ESB Double Whopper Full Member

    1,460
    8
    Jun 11, 2006
    I don't know that having "textbook form" makes you a "technical fighter". Sweet Pea was a technical fighter who often disregarded leg placement, glove defensive stance, and body mechanics. I think that a technical fighter is someone who hits and is in return not hit. Sweet Pea, Willie Pep, Hopkins spring to mind.

    Still you can be an inside or an outside technical fighter. Mayweather is a potshot, counterpunch, very accurate outside technical fighter. James Toney in his prime was a "in the pocket" master. having a sick understanding for his opponents body mechanics and punch anticipation. This let him counterpunch and shoulder roll technically negating his opponents attacks while pressing home his own advantages.