the klitschkos would dominate any era in heavyweight boxing apart from lennox lewis's

So Hendo seems to disappear when I appear does he?

So, what about the man who would appear in your abode to fornicate with your mother every time your father disappeared. Does that too consequent in that man being the equivalence of your father? Ask yourself that question you illegitimate invertebrate

I'm sure this HENDO must be an individual of sound opinion and judgement, a repellent for illogical *******s like you.

I would hate to disappoint you, but I am the one and only EverLast, and I have a primary purpose of wiping out the existence of nuthuggers like you.

Deplorable whoreson.

 

government cheque you mean?

Are you seriously attempting to categorise me within the scope of welfare support, when you are the semi-literate mother****er on here who sprouts out a diabolically bull**** load of 2,400 worth of posts, in less than a year?!!

I stomp on the measly imitation of testicles you possess, you klitschko nuthugging wankstain.

 

If you watch old films of Foreman he really reacts the same as Danny Williams when he gets hits.
So I think 70's Foreman was actually no better than 2003 Williams...

 

This is literally why you are a vile, hideous parasite on this forum. So you are suggesting that Danny Williams would have won the World Heavyweight Title if replaced with Foreman in the 70's?

You abominable, repugnant, adulterated hogwash

atsch

 

Well, as far as their defense.....They were both about the same.
Foreman made his name on 190lb and 200lb fighters. Williams fought much bigger men............

 

Everlast, man I never laughed so hard in a long time . . . . ahahahaha! You are so RIGHT these guys are nutthuggers and should be vanquished.

I knew there was something about Bubby . . . HAHAHAAAH!!

 

You have the nerve to continue posting here?

Foreman is one of the true great heavyweights, Danny Williams, isnt. I do not believe I am even having to explain this atsch

I will explain this to you in a context which is probably more familiar to you:

Lets take a *****....a good ***** makes good money, and has a reputation as such....a legendary *****, who may win 2 World Titles during her career, has a reputation that is legendary.

Now, lets take a failed prostitute (ie your mother)....this useless *****, may have scored once in her career (ala Danny Williams over a beyond shot Tyson)....but every ***** gets ****ed once, and gives birth to *******s like you.... until it is exposed as being utterly repulsive, and is never successful again.

:hi:

 

:good

I know, what a total reprobate eh

 

I will not debate with some one who 500 years ago would be shining my shoes. But my goverment has taken tens of thousands of dollore from me and my family for nobodys like you so you may eat for free......

 

LMFAO

you lucidly illiterate *******


are you referring to the thousands the government took back from you in overpayments? hahahaha

seriously, you have been exposed as being one of the most shameless trolls on this entire forum.....stop embarrassing yourself, as I am feeling slightly embarrassed for you.

Go seek solace in the diseased sanctuary of the misfortunate ***** you originate from, and avoid sprouting out **** on here.

 

This thread is rediculous. Ali, Big G, Frazier, Louis, and Marciano would have had their way with klits. Not only did they fight 15 rounds at a faster pace, but they didnt back up and took BOMBS with harder gloves and kept their composure. If they were to kave fought the klits in a 12 round championship match of today IMO modern boxing fans would be ashamed. I dont think klits have the ability to deal with the constant pressure of fraizer, foreman, or marciano. And no doubt they can box better than anyone in the division today however u can put a leopard in with a house cat and make it look unbeatable. But once you put the leopard in with a lion, thats a whole different story. N those greats from the past era's were no doubt lions

 

:good :happy

thank God.

excellent post

 

Do you really have to be a klit nuthugger wank stain or whatever the correct term is to think that the klitsckos would be able to deal with a 5'11" 205lb slugger?
To put this into some perspective Joe Frazier is about the same size and weight as denis Lebedev.

Its debatable whether ali and/or foreman would beat them or not. Ali's speed and movement up until about 1972 would always give them a tough time and foreman had the knockout power, but remember in their primes they were very rarely going up against boxers that would be heavyweights today. So if someone suggests that a boxer who was beating boxers 6'0 and 190-215lbs may not beat a 6'7" 240lb boxer, I dont think that really makes them an idiot.

I think 7/10 times either klitscko would outbox and stop a prime tyson, the other 3 times tyson may win by stoppage.

So other than Tyson foreman and Ali I really dont think there is anyone to really challenge the Klits.
Does anyone really not think that the brothers would not make up half of the top four heavyweights in any time?

 

The answer to that question is yes. Frazier compared to Lebedev?!

What a disgracefully stupid example. David Haye is probably the same size as Muhammad Ali, but the comparisons end right there. Your examples are based only on size. Why did Dempsey destroy Willard then? Ever heard of such thing called BOXING ABILITY you ****ing IDIOT.

I dont give a **** how big the Klitschko's are, they would have been destroyed by the likes of Ali, and simply arent comparable.

You most definitely are a klitschko nuthugging wankstain, and you probably dont even know it, but you have just been diagnosed.

**** off.

 

Bubby, Everlast and Jasper, could you just send these messages privately to each other, we dont really need to be clogging up the thread with puerile insults.