PAC-Floyd common opponents, who's doing a better job?

3-1 Mayweather.

Mayweather fought better versions of ODLH and Mosley. ODLH was a ghost in the ring against Pac, fighting in a weight division he hadn't fought in for what, 7 years? Mayweather fought a CLEARLY better version up at 154. Mosley was coming off a fantastic win against Margarito where has when Pac fought him, Floyd had previously toyed with him for 12 rounds and he'd drew with Mora.

We all know what happened with Floyd and JMM whereas Pac went to a draw with him. Many argue that he JMM beat him. No way though should JMM be up anywhere the weight he fought against Floyd that night, the same is going to happen to him when he comes up against Pac very shortly IMO.

I'd say Pac fought a better version of Hatton as he fought him down at 140 however then again the argument can be made that Mayweather had already set the blueprint and Hatton wasn't really the same fighter since he realised he could be knocked out and lost his '0'.

 

JMM
Better version- Pac
More impressive win- Mayweather


Hatton -
Better version- Pac
More impressive win- Pac


De La Hoya -
Better version- Mayweather
More impressive win- Pac


Mosley -
Better version- Mayweather
More impressive win- equal/either..or

 

The bolded above is as ******ed as it can get.

The way Pac fought Hatton was totally different from how Mayweather beat Hatton, so how the **** could Mayweather's "blueprint" had any relevance in this discussion?

Also Hatton realising he could be KOed? :huh Yeah, the fight with Mayweather made him realise that, that is probably why he charged headfirst against Pac as his defensive stance...:beat

 

Agree with this.

 

JMM:
-JMM fought pac at his comfortable weight. D/SD
-JMM fought Mayweather at his unknown weight and Floyd even cheated. UD
-PAC

Hatton:
-Hatton fought Floyd at his uncomfortable weight. he won how many fights at 147? did he won comfortably on that weight (b4 floyd)? no. KO
-Hatton fought Pac at his comfortable weight and where he murders almost all of his previous opponents. KO
-PAC

ODLH:
-ODLH fought Floyd at his comfortable weight. SD
-ODLH fought Pac at WW and paid it dearly. before the fight, 99% predicted a ODLH KO within 6 minutes. After the fight, excuses poured the boards. TKO
-Floyd

MOSLEY:
-Both Floyd and Pac fought a washed up grandpa Shane.
-Shane, who just KOd Margo, but has a year on inactivity fought Floyd and lost.
-Shane, who just lost to Floyd and had a draw fight, fought Pac and almost get KTFO
-Mayweather

Result: DRAW

 

Mayweather.
Mayweather fought better versions of De La Hoya, Hatton and Mosley. He domantaed al of them. The split decision in the De La Hoya fight was B.S..
Pacquiao bet a better Marquez twice. He had his hands full twice.

 

mayweather fought jmm and hatton at welter, his confortable weight
pac fought these guys in their comfortable weight

pac climbed 2 divisions to face oscar (after having only fought once at lightweight), floyd faced oscar at super welter, a division which is well within his weight reach

on mosley, pac is the obvious smaller guy here.

 

:good

 

hatton was really overtrained when he met pac.its no esscuse.if u know something about nutrition you could se his face was really thin at spots where it shouldent have...and when you overtrain a babys punch kan knock you out.thats truth.he made osacar frikkin walk aroundhalf dead at 145!!! you could see thath de la hoyas head was bigger than is f... head because he was so drained...and when you drain your body luke de la hoya did you also overtrain..floyd went up to 154 and fought de la hoya at almost his prime and at de la hoyas weight.im a floyd fan as well as many other fan.pac is a good fighter but peronaly i like boxers more than fighters.using your inntelligens,smartnes and not winning by ko. when i see a fight and the boxer who leads on the scorecards get ko'd i dont see the boxer who wins by ko the winner.i just se him knocking him out...but of corse like in many interviews with the old timers they say back in the 60s 70s 80s... people loved boxing.the sweet sience, the boxers who could make a bully look silly by using skills...today they just want knockouts.an i think the reason why we dont have so skilled boxers today are because we dont have enaugh good trainers who can teach all te tecnuiqs thath they had before.we have to remember, the boxing tecnuiqs where made whay back in time,and that era is gone now,so we miss so mutch experience from the beginning of the boxing tecnuiqs...today we have fighters just trowing punches..when a boxer throws a jab just dipt to the right and counter with a stright right han.or just punch punch punc,insted of thinking,analysing your oponent.make him miss,let him trow his best punch .example if a boxer likse work the innsid and are agressive,just let him come in so he sees that it safe to come in,let him throw the right hand without countering him so he thinks it safe to trow the right hand for a whole round and then al of a sudden when he thinks it safe you step back and fire a well timed left hook over his right hand,because you have timed his right hand for h whole round without countering him so thath he is comforable throwing it and dont think you counter it,and then boom,he dont expect it at all... yes off course some will say im an idiot for writhin this,but then you dont love the sweet science of boxing .and usually the person calling you a idiot is the idiot himself

 

I agree with your post, but dude you need to really check your spelling and your grammar because it's horrible. No offense...:hi:

 

Styles make fights.

 

strange, making hatton shed more weigh to make 140 is beneficial to hatton, but "letting" jmm fight in ww, helps jmm, according to the pturds...since fight night weights are all that matter to them