PAC-Floyd common opponents, who's doing a better job?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by vengeex, Aug 27, 2011.


  1. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010
    Mayweather fought fresher, younger, more confident versions of Hatton, Mosley, and ODLH, at weights that did not drain them. Yes, Hatton fought at 140 for most of his career, but, Floyd fought at 130 -135 for most of his career. So, a fight between two guys who were not natural WW's, at WW, does not yield much of an advantage to either, IMO. Not to mention, each man fought at least 1 bout at the weight, prior.

    Pac fought a fresher, younger, always confident version of JMM, at weights that were comfortable for both men, at the time. However, ODLH was a corpse against Pac at 147. The fact that Pac moved up two divisions and dominated the fight, said more about his ability to carry the weight, than about his prowess over ODLH. It told me nothing about how he'd handle a natural WW...that is until he dominated Cotto (now that was impressive). Against, Hatton, IMPRESSIVE victory, but AFTER Floyd stole this man's bravado. Against Mosley, again...AFTER Floyd showed how much Mosley really had left. Before that, they were not trying to go anywhere near Mosley. It was a **** fight, in which Mosely and Manny were performing at lower levels than we'd seen previously... Mosley, because of his age and inability to pull the trigger, and Pac because of Mosley's movement and his leg cramps(?).

    Against common opponents, I'd have to give it to Floyd....3-1. IMO, the upcoming JMM fight is a better point of comparison, than any of the above. JMM will have looked good prior to each of these bouts, and he will have had to move up two divisions for each. And he still has something left in the tank.
     
  2. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,027
    5,555
    Oct 5, 2009
    well with all things considered going into the bouts id say they are about even

    JMM- by my card Manny is 1-0-1 agaisnt JMM but had life and death battles vs him...Floyd after a layoff took him apart by being sharp and quick not using his size and laying on him....Manny got him younger and dropped him, Floyd dominated him and dropepd him

    Oscar- Floyd struggled and got a SD that shoulda been a UD in a fight he dominanted and out pointed him and won by taking the last 4 when Oscar tired he put on a great performance....Manny fought him well below his comfort zone and punished him, he was a huge underdog and got the stoppage....id say floyd edges by form of opponent beat but mannys method of victory is greater i think

    Hatton- Floyd stuggled at times vs the undefeated 140 pound champ i had it nip tuck thru 6 then Hatton jsut got worn down, great performance and finish from Floyd and he did it first....Manny fought him at 140 dropepd him 3 times en route to a brutal KTFO, ppl say Hatton was KO'd by floyd and look horrible vs laszano but had a career day vs malinaggi, ppl sight floyd sr corner drama i dont know whats true or not

    Mosley- Floyd after a rocky start absolutley dominated caught him flush many times prob coulda stopped him if he put shots togetther later....Manny hurt him dropepd him and discouraged him to a route

    in my view they are about even

    manny on a good day outworks and over runs guys bloodies them drops them and typically stops them

    floyd on a good day methodically breaks you down takes away your game and hits you at will, seemingly carriers opponents he could probably stop but prefers to punish for 12 rounds

    id say about even
     
  3. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    Pacquiao did not fight a better Hatton. Roach would even tell you that the Hatton that fought Floyd was better
     
  4. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,757
    335
    Aug 4, 2007
    I'd say 3-1 in favor of Floyd but what about the guys Floyd didn't face like Cotto, Margarito and Clottey. Three of the better/best WWs of this era. Pacman stepped up to the challenge, Floyd didn't.
     
  5. Doc

    Doc Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,915
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    Mayweather fought the better version of Hatton, Mosely, DLH

    PAC fought the better version of JMM.


    I chose Mayweather.

    I don't really rate PACs victory over Mosely or DLH that high.. Obviously when PAC the vulture gets there to pick up the crumbs he already knows it's gonna be an easy meal.
     
  6. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    negative on the Shane..

    Floyd FOGUHT A #3 IN THE WORLD RANKED SHANE MOSLEY WHO WAS COMING OFF A GREAT VICTORY OVER TONY.

    PAC FOUGHT A # 14 IN THE WORLD RANKED SHANE MOSLEY WHO WAS COMING OFF A DRAW (I THOUGHT HE WON THOUGH) TO SERGIO MORA.

    THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE IN FIGHTING A GUY WHEN HE'S RANKED AT THE TOP AND FIGHTING A GUY WHEN HE IS NOT RANKED AT THE TOP:deal

    The only man "ranked higher" in both the division and the world not named Shane Mosley was Manny Pacquiao at the time Floyd fought him:deal
     
  7. PeteDawg

    PeteDawg Observant Observer Full Member

    2,918
    0
    Jan 15, 2010
    nallege???
     
  8. TMalik

    TMalik Member Full Member

    474
    0
    Mar 15, 2010
    :lol:
     
  9. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011

    There is no way pac should have dominated the same opponents that Floyd struggled with even if they were 1 yr removed from losing to Floyd. None were shot or drained even though excuses are easy.
     
  10. TMalik

    TMalik Member Full Member

    474
    0
    Mar 15, 2010
    They weren't the same opponents for the reasons you just stated.
     
  11. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    Lol.... Sure they were... So was Oscar not the same when Floyd edged out a split decision since DLH lost to Shane, tito and nard? SHANE had already lost to winky and Vernon. So are we to dismiss any win over a fighter with loses? Lol. Not one fighter who faced pac has used the excuse of being weight drained as the reason for losing to Manny... Those excuses come from Floyd fans..
     
  12. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,757
    335
    Aug 4, 2007
    What's so funny about my post?
     
  13. TMalik

    TMalik Member Full Member

    474
    0
    Mar 15, 2010
    Note the people that Shane lost to. Winky Wright & Vernon Forrest. De La Hoya lost to Shane, Tito, and Bernard Hopkins.

    Pause.

    De La Hoya himself has said that he was weight drained. Freddy Roach admits this, and you dont. How could you not? Hatton was an undefeated fighter, until Floyd beat him. Pacquaio's camp wanted NO parts of Mosley. Shane begged for a fight with Pacquaio at Welter after the Oscar fight, Roach says 142, Shane says he cant make it, then changes his mind and says he can...and they STILL didnt fight him. Only when he loses to Floyd, and draws with Mora is the fight made.

    You know...I respect opinions. I just feel like it's some powerful Kool-Aid that some Pacquiao fans drink. And I really think that most of the stuff said on here pertaining to Floyd/Manny isnt even up for debate when someone has really paid attention to what has gone on over these years.
     
  14. Hook!

    Hook! Proud member of team G. Full Member

    9,463
    1
    Jun 25, 2011


    :thumbsup
     
  15. KnuckleUp99

    KnuckleUp99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,055
    1
    Jan 15, 2011
    Well.... Who did Ricky Oscar and Shane lose to before pac destroyed them? Floyd! Who is one of the best fighters in tbae last decade.

    Find me the direct quote from Oscar saying he lost because of being weight drained. I can find you quotes from nacho saying Oscar was not drained and pac was just too fast.

    It's funny you mention "drinking the koolaid"..... Floyd has gotten a hold of some pretty potent stuff that causes his most loyal fans to get stuck on stupid even when the truth is right there in front of them. Denial is very powerful.