is srr overrated

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by killuminix, Aug 26, 2011.


  1. Kingkazim

    Kingkazim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,806
    12
    Aug 26, 2009
    If anyone mentions SRR as the GOAT..then they have good reason to. Most people on the general boxing forum will have SRR or Ali as the GOAT

    whereas on the classic its Harry Greb or perhaps Langford. Either way, SRR will and should always be considered as the possible greatest fighter ever
     
  2. Kingkazim

    Kingkazim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,806
    12
    Aug 26, 2009
    Thank you timagen for presenting Beauty to us
     
  3. Waynegrade

    Waynegrade Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,684
    29
    Jul 27, 2008
    Seriously, there is No ONE who can compare to the greatest of them all, Sugar Ray... When they say he fought everyone, they mean EVERYONE ! Look at his roster of opponents,incompareable... At welter he was incredible, then for good measure. He moved up and conqured the middle`s too. He had Maxim beat, at lt. heavy ! Does anyone with any boxing sense really think that PBF or PAC would would stand up to the power that SRR brandished at welter ? He was superior in skills to anyone at welter,and here`s the scary part... He had way more balls too... He could dig down deeper than anyone. How about is Robbie truly, underated ??? I almost want to get sick at how easily they throw the `great`word around. It`s an insult to the truly great fighters who fought often,fought hard and fought the best and tuly learned their craft. Moore, SRR, Louis,Armstrong, to name a few...
     
  4. Peppermint

    Peppermint Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,014
    18
    Sep 7, 2010
    I dont think hes overrated at all, but his fellow greats Pep and Armstrong are vastly underrated so it creates that illusion
     
  5. Waynegrade

    Waynegrade Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,684
    29
    Jul 27, 2008
    Good call there...
     
  6. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    In terms of his talant/skills/abillity no he's one of the best. However when it comes to results his record is disipoiting. That's right from the start of his career to 1960 or 61 he should have never lost. Yet he did lose 9 times, plus 3 draws. 7 of those 9 loses came in championship bouts. It would be more understandable if he lost one of the many non-tittle bouts he fought as both welterweight and middleweight champion.
    talant/skills/abillity means a lot but so dose results. I've herd every excuse in the book and than some, or about his amazing winning streak. He's not the only one. Willie Pep and Benny Leonard come to mind. All three had streaks for the same reason. They were suposed to. Leonard did have losses but never in a lightweight championship bout. He had a draw with Ted "Kid" Lewis and a contervisual loss to Jack Britton both for welterweight championships
    This content is protected

    Not only was Benny Leonard a better more acomplished boxer, as you can see he was a much more handsom man.
     
  7. Rexrapper 1

    Rexrapper 1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,595
    725
    Aug 23, 2010
    Charles Burley says hi.
     
  8. JCC_is_overated

    JCC_is_overated FACT Full Member

    654
    0
    Jul 29, 2011
    how is he overrated?

    There is not one fighter in the history of the sport that I would pick to beat him at welterweight and middleweight in his prime. What, you guys want him to be dominant at light heavyweight also?
     
  9. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    As soon as I read the title I knew it was some dumbass *******.

    Robinson is pretty much a universally seen as the GOAT. In fact I would say that about 85-90% of the lists you we see has him number 1.

    The the phase pound for pound was indeed coined for Robinson, its no myth.

    PS Pac got his ass whipped several times in his prime at what ******* came is his best weight yet he would distroy SRR???
     
  10. Bo Bo Olson

    Bo Bo Olson Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,292
    5
    Aug 11, 2004
    At Welter he was very tall, at 5 foot 11, fought all sorts of good 5-6 and 5-8 fighters; which was the normal size of welters back then..
    At least one of those fights, the crowd thought the other fella won and bood like hell. I'd have to look up the record again name starts with A...one of the best welters of his time.

    Fought only one man of 5 -10, as welter.
    Was Hearns tall for his time.

    Dodged Bevins Big Time.
    Charles Burley??? Too.




    He was very very good, better than SRL.
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,743
    21,994
    Sep 15, 2009
    Didn't fight charles burley but that aside, you cant really complain about him.

    The most skilled fighter in existence imo.

    Some fighters fought a couple of extra names and some achieved a bit more but he's right up there in my top 3.
     
  12. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,167
    10,604
    Jul 28, 2009
    And Armstrong too, probably argued about as much as Greb, from what I've seen rationally argued. Armstrong, Langford, Greb, all fair and rational cases to be above SRR. A tiny, tiny, tiny fraction go for the very dark horse (ironically described? :huh) of Fitzsimmons. SRR's at the head of my own ATG list though.
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,743
    21,994
    Sep 15, 2009
    Would that tiny tiny tiny fraction be me on my own :lol:
     
  14. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    yeah right pacquiao ko1 srr lolz